Help with Keris ID and information

Raja Muda · 9th March 2005, 08:10 AM

Yep, exactly what I was thinking of John. But take a close look at mmontoro's keris and compare it with Paul's. There's no picetan and sogokan.

rasdan · 9th March 2005, 09:01 AM

I think mmontoro's keris does have a picitan and the sogokan runs from the so-soran to the tip.

BluErf · 9th March 2005, 12:49 PM

Just when we think we have seen everything, something weird pops up.

I have a feeling this is a Riau Bugis keris blade, or a S. Malay Bugis keris blade. Its different in aesthetics from the N Malay blades which tend towards "long and lanky" forms (like Paul's keris). The fullers are unusual...

rahman · 9th March 2005, 01:20 PM

Take another look at Paul's keris -- it has a pinggang (waist). It tapers in and then flares out. There's a certain grace to it, as in most other keris.

That's what threw me off with mmontoro's keris. It flares out suddenly (almost like a sundang). This is either a hybrid or someone's bad idea of a copycat sundang. But at 13.5ins, it's too short to be sundang.

mmontoro · 9th March 2005, 03:33 PM

Thank you to everyone for your comments. If I may ask a few questions, please forgive my ignorance regarding keris and appropriate terminology.

What does the term, "Malela" mean? Is it a reference to geographical orgin or blade type?

Is is a correct assumption that the hulu it is wearing does not belong to this type? If so, which type is correct and where might I get one and the correct pendongkok?

Is this style of blade considered more for fighting than one with luk?

Does this type usually have pamor?

Thanks, again.

John · 10th March 2005, 01:53 AM

Mmontoro,

You could see some discussions on Malela blades plus examples at the folowing earlier threads which may answer some of your questions. Broadly, the main characteristics are the pair of fullers along the blade plus that the blades do not have pamor.
http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000969.html
http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000978.html
http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/002097.html

BluErf does make an interesting point in that the finer aesthetics of N Malayan pieces do not seem to be evident on the piece in question. Put this piece amongst a group of N Malayan Malelas, I think it's not difficult for one to pick it up as an odd one. The ada-ada (spine) is also broader but at least for now I think the piece looks nearest to a Malela.

But as always I defer to the more knowledgeable members and learning along the way...

mmontoro · 10th March 2005, 04:34 AM

Thanks, John, for those references to previous threads. In the second thread there was a photo that I thought looked similar except for the greneng(?) or fretwork. This is the photo:

9th March 2005, 08:10 AM	#1
Raja Muda Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Posts: 100	Melela Yep, exactly what I was thinking of John. But take a close look at mmontoro's keris and compare it with Paul's. There's no picetan and sogokan.

9th March 2005, 03:33 PM	#5
mmontoro Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 91	Thanks and a couple of questions Thank you to everyone for your comments. If I may ask a few questions, please forgive my ignorance regarding keris and appropriate terminology. What does the term, "Malela" mean? Is it a reference to geographical orgin or blade type? Is is a correct assumption that the hulu it is wearing does not belong to this type? If so, which type is correct and where might I get one and the correct pendongkok? Is this style of blade considered more for fighting than one with luk? Does this type usually have pamor? Thanks, again.

9th March 2005, 09:01 AM	#2
rasdan Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Kuala Lumpur Posts: 369	I think mmontoro's keris does have a picitan and the sogokan runs from the so-soran to the tip.

9th March 2005, 12:49 PM	#3
BluErf Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Singapore Posts: 1,180	Just when we think we have seen everything, something weird pops up. I have a feeling this is a Riau Bugis keris blade, or a S. Malay Bugis keris blade. Its different in aesthetics from the N Malay blades which tend towards "long and lanky" forms (like Paul's keris). The fullers are unusual...

9th March 2005, 01:20 PM	#4
rahman Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Singapore Posts: 84	Take another look at Paul's keris -- it has a pinggang (waist). It tapers in and then flares out. There's a certain grace to it, as in most other keris. That's what threw me off with mmontoro's keris. It flares out suddenly (almost like a sundang). This is either a hybrid or someone's bad idea of a copycat sundang. But at 13.5ins, it's too short to be sundang.

10th March 2005, 01:53 AM	#6
John Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Land below the wind Posts: 135	Mmontoro, You could see some discussions on Malela blades plus examples at the folowing earlier threads which may answer some of your questions. Broadly, the main characteristics are the pair of fullers along the blade plus that the blades do not have pamor. http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000969.html http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000978.html http://www.vikingsword.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/002097.html BluErf does make an interesting point in that the finer aesthetics of N Malayan pieces do not seem to be evident on the piece in question. Put this piece amongst a group of N Malayan Malelas, I think it's not difficult for one to pick it up as an odd one. The ada-ada (spine) is also broader but at least for now I think the piece looks nearest to a Malela. But as always I defer to the more knowledgeable members and learning along the way...

10th March 2005, 04:34 AM	#7
mmontoro Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 91	Thanks, John, for those references to previous threads. In the second thread there was a photo that I thought looked similar except for the greneng(?) or fretwork. This is the photo: