Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 7th March 2005, 07:43 PM   #1
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

while i digest all these lectures, with intense consultations to the diccionary ( my english is very limited ), here is a set of pictures on the hilt fixation, that i had already prepared.
i know the use of sand paper is a crime... i beg some tolerance, as it was heavily soaked sand paper "360", a very soft one.
Attached Images
 
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2005, 08:16 PM   #2
fearn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,247
Default

Thanks Fernando!

I'd say the handle is pretty definitely cast (via lost wax) directly onto the blade--you can see that in the imperfections in the way the brass meets the steel. I'd also say that the figures were cast directly with the handle, not brazed (welded, but with brass) on later.

The one thing that's bothering me is the total lack of corrosion on the brass. There are a couple of ways to get this: either it's been in a temperature controlled setting, it was cleaned (possibly with acid--I've done this by accident and boy does it take off patina and corrosion ), or it's a relatively new piece. Or all of the above.

Considering the relative lack of bubbles, sprues, and other signs of casting, whoever did the cast did a pretty decent job, I think.

Hi Tom,

One thing to clear up is that I was thinking that whoever made it stamped the designs onto the wax master, rather than onto the finished metal.

Fearn
fearn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th March 2005, 10:22 PM   #3
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

right, Conogre.
a giraffe ! the question i've put in the first place, but i think i didn't get myself understood . yes, a pair of eyes and nostrils,the head back, the mouth shape ! a giraffe. right. even a neck can be assumed, and its designs, as well as the eyes, nostrils and snake spots might have been post punctionned.
the patina evidence prevails ... most of the glowing parts are due to my phrenetic cleaning sense ( must be a trauma ), aggravated by my forgetting i am a forced left hander ( i've lost the right one ), and things don't come so brilliant.
any more macros, just tell. i can not miss this learning so much in a glimpse.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.