Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 6th March 2005, 05:20 PM   #3
Conogre
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
Default

From the look of the crack at the bottom, I'd say that your assesment was probably correct and it was actually done fairly well.
The terms "common" and "rare" can sometimes be misleading, with a flyssa being common to a long-time collector who has seen, handles and owned many, while that same flyssa to a new collector, is indeeed a treasure, and rightly so.
As more and more countries "modernize" the old ways of making pieces are fast vanishing forever, with even its true name lost in as little as one or two generations.
With weapons like a flyssa, if you've only held a small one it's impossible to realize just how remarkable a large, sword-sized piece can be, thinking that the "delicate feel" of the knife must be carried over into a sword, which it most definitely is not.
For whatever it's worth, many "purists" regularly pass over truly rare pieces because they are different, thus not a "real" one.
One thing about ethin bladed weapons is that there are as many different ways to view the pieces and the cultures that produce them as there are weapons themselves.
Mike
Conogre is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.