![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Haifa, Israel
Posts: 183
|
Another one from the same lot:
![]() Shorter blade 28 inches long 7 mm thick, quite heavy, with a clear thrusting spear shaped tip of diamond cross section and raised yelmen 6 inches long: ![]() Tang with two holes and a short blade "colar" (Tunkou):
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 8
|
Hello Teodor,
It's hard to make a distinction between geographical locations and peoples in the Migration period, I think in terms of peoples for that reason. The Magyars, Khazars, Bulgars and a bunch of other people were mixed up together but I guess it's easiest to say Magyar for the 4th sword in the pic since the Hungarian museums have a lot of similar swords. The straight sword posted-- that is a nice old one from east of the Urals for sure. I remember it was online a few years ago, been way over cleaned. Whoever found it should have left it alone. Anybody know where it is now? The last sword on the pics is a real nice one too, does it have the hilt parts? If so it would be great to see them. Will try to post one of mine that is complete. Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: D.C. area
Posts: 8
|
Here's a sword from the same family with the hilt intact. It has a narrow groove running down the blade, you can see it up at the forte. Got lucky on this one, some original surface still on it
88 cm long, blade is 75 cm.Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,727
|
Lovely sword Tim,
I have blades from the 19th century in worse shape . Here are some more sabres from a catalogue of archaeological finds in what is now Bulgaria. The first are considered Bulgar and earlier, the second group are conidered Magyar and a little later, towards the Xth century. One of them I believe appears on the picture I posted: Regards, Teodor |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|