![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Hi All!! Thank you very much for your comments
![]() Ganjawulung and Mans, I know nothing about keris, but I was thinking that the blade was javanese in a non javanese dress (could you tell if bugis or malay? Thanks ![]() ![]() Anyway I like it and as Jose said the grains of the wood is very nice. Thank you again ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
I agree with the general consensus that the blade is Javanese.
A good old one too, although it had seen better days. Fittings, seems to be Bugis. Hilt is in the 'kerdas' form... seems to be made from kemuning wood (Murraya paniculata). Hilt ring (pendongkok) is in an uncommon form, nice original piece, probably made from brass with a single piece construction. Sheath's cross piece, is in the 'tebeng' (tey-beng) form... probably made from the kemuning wood. Sheath's shaft seems to be from angsana wood (Pterocarpus indicus). There seems to be some patchwork at the joints. Rattan binding seems newer, probably not original to the sheath. The piece looks familiar... was it from one of our forum-mates? ![]() Wood grains are pretty. Kemuning wood have a kind of chatoyance that is beautiful. I like the hilt and hilt ring. ![]() Last edited by Alam Shah; 28th May 2007 at 02:40 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 1,243
|
![]()
Thank you very much Alam
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
I suspect the sampir has been reworked before. The form looks too flat, and the ridge on the short-end of the sampir seems to run off the sheath abruptly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|