Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th May 2007, 04:58 PM   #1
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

I was troubled by the lack of blade close-up as well, but overall this struck me as an exceptional sword.

The winner is a sophisticated collector (and a member of this forum), who may comment further.
Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2007, 07:54 PM   #2
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,843
Default

Although way beyond my pocket it does look jolly impressive. I personally cannot see any problem with the blade or its decoration. I like the scabbard and guard very much. I am bothered by the repair to the hilt. The brass/copper wire and clumsy lump of solder seem to show a recent restoration.
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007, 12:40 AM   #3
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
Default

An interesting sword...ornate but not 'over the top'. Have to agree with Tim about the wire work...it looks 'out of place'.
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th May 2007, 06:48 AM   #4
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

My main argument was the fact that the gold coftgari and stamps look strickingly brand new. I've seen similar stamps being offered for $100 each in Damascus. The fittings obviously look old, and typical for the era. Perhaps there is something we did not see on the pictures, i.e. nice wootz pattern and/or old coftgari on the ridge of the blade.
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 12:27 PM   #5
Valjhun
Member
 
Valjhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 692
Default

Well, a textbook syrian shamshir. The koftgari does look new, but could be old. You can't say that for sure just from thoose poor photos.
Valjhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th May 2007, 04:08 PM   #6
josh stout
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valjhun
Well, a textbook syrian shamshir. The koftgari does look new, but could be old. You can't say that for sure just from thoose poor photos.
I am inexperienced in looking at koftgari, and as you say the pictures are not great, but to me, one side looks older and fine, while the other looks new and a bit crude.
Josh
josh stout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2007, 02:42 AM   #7
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

The koftgari looks exceptionally new for an old sword. Perhaps, just like Fiegel's swords, this one spent all its life in the armory, cleaned and oiled regularly etc.

The buyer is a very experienced collector and I respect his judgement.
Hope he will show us more of the blade and answer the inevitable questions.
Congratulations with the win and all the best!
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 12:21 PM   #8
ALEX
Member
 
ALEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ariel
... The buyer is a very experienced collector and I respect his judgement...
Yes, I can see it now Ariel

Charles, looking at your close-ups, the sword looks much better than what seller showed. Nice pattern! I must agree - the coftgari does not look THAT new, especially on the blade's ridge, and the quality is definitely of a high grade. Again - congratulations to you! This sword is well worth (and well over) of what you paid for it.
The stamp closer to a hilt reads: "O Sham, God protects you". The word "Sham" in this case means Syria. The long inscription means the following: "Do your best to do good deeds in life. The deeds the man does in his life stay in history even after his death. The generations which will follow will read what he/you did in his/your life".
ALEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 12:23 PM   #9
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
Default

Thanks very much Alex.

Yes, I was very pleased.

I am very happy to get your feedback on the koftgari, because this was a bit of a worry for me.

Thanks again.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.