Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th April 2007, 06:34 PM   #1
Freddy
Member
 
Freddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sint-Amandsberg (near Ghent, Belgium)
Posts: 830
Arrow

Katana, do you want to trade for the car ?





Freddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2007, 08:23 PM   #2
katana
Member
 
katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy
Katana, do you want to trade for the car ?
katana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2007, 08:37 PM   #3
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,843
Default

Some girls say, Big car small trumbash. Oops
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2007, 08:46 PM   #4
Freddy
Member
 
Freddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sint-Amandsberg (near Ghent, Belgium)
Posts: 830
Arrow

And what do girls say about a lot of trumbash ?







Freddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2007, 08:49 PM   #5
Tim Simmons
Member
 
Tim Simmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,843
Default

Give us a rest oops
Tim Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2016, 05:06 PM   #6
Marcus
Member
 
Marcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 420
Default attribution

Three contributors in this thread say they read (or red) that the number of holes corresponded to the owner's number of wives. However, no one cites a source for that. How can this be credible without a source?
Marcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2016, 06:52 AM   #7
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus
Three contributors in this thread say they read (or red) that the number of holes corresponded to the owner's number of wives. However, no one cites a source for that. How can this be credible without a source?
Very well noted Marcus, and I must admit that it is indeed very disappointing to the considerable number of readers out there who often may be researching topics and these details would be most helpful.
In defense of the guys in this discussion, including our late friend Lew, were actually so well versed in these fields that they likely were just complacent. Despite the level of detail many of us place in posts, we are not held to any academic standards, so such placement is purely voluntary.

I did, however, respond with what I could find as an answer on the other trumbash thread, and noted source for what I hope will offer some useful explanation.

Last edited by Jim McDougall; 8th August 2016 at 07:22 AM.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.