![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 48
|
![]()
"Destroy anything to dust?"
With a good beefy blade like that, I believe it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,200
|
![]()
Hi Jens,
Fantastic motif!!! I agree with Joe, that blade means business. This decoration seems extremely unusual, it seems almost a herringbone type effect. Since the chevron patterns have key significance symbolically, and we know that there are key symbolisms in the floral patterns, I wonder what may be held in this one? It seems that often it is tempting for many to presume aesthetics are the only goal in such unusual motif, but with the weapons of India, there are often cleverly assigned symbolisms. That with the very intimidating message hidden beneath the quillons suggest there may be more. The closest thing I can see typologically to the style of decoration as well as hilt form on this hilt would be that shown in Rawson (plate 44) which suggests that it is of Lahuri type, and probably early 19th c. The example shown in Rawson carries a floral theme, but distictively uses the bordering technique that outlines the features of the hilt. Maybe we can find this type of 'herringbone' motif in other Indian art or metalwork? All the best, Jim Last edited by Jim McDougall; 30th January 2007 at 04:47 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 181
|
![]() Quote:
I don't know the traditions of India, but in Viking culture runes inscribed on weapons weren't just names or descriptions, but were often active spells or charms to give the weapon more potency. Given the hidden nature of the inscription, is there any chance of the same being present here, a spell placed by the weaponsmaker to make the sword more deadly? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]()
I remember a discussion with a Sikh collector, who came across as an authority. He told me the reason that Sikhs put their inscriptions on the inner knucklebow, and not on the blade (or a place of show) was because they fought the British in the 19thC, and by then, our technology in telescopic equipment was so advanced, that we could look across a battlefield, and pick out a leaders name on the blade, and single him out!
I was amazed at this insight. Not only at this individuals level of knowledge, but at the intelligence of his ancestors, and the keen eyesight of the British. So Jens, maybe the placing of your inscriptions was so the owner could charge into a battlefield, pointing his sword forward and displaying this curse to dispell any telescope-carrying invader. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 181
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,718
|
![]()
Thanks for the mails. It is of course easier for me, who sits with the tulwar, to have a close look, and I believe that it could very well be stylized leaves arranged in a chevron design. I have no doubt that a sword with a curse written on it was supposed to be more dangerous than one without a curse, so I think it worked like it did between the Vikings. We must remember that although some Vikings had changed religion, as well as some Indians had, their roots were still in the old religions, and trying to get protection from both religions, when going to battle, would no doubt have been very common. Some, no doubt, used the old designs, although the knowledge of what they meant had been forgotten, so to them it was a decoration, and others used it, still knowing the meaning.
Yes B.I, I agree fully with you, there is an immense amount of valuable knowledge out there – the only problem is to find it ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 485
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|