Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20th February 2005, 03:50 AM   #1
Andrew
Member
 
Andrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
Default

Chert hand axe?
Andrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 03:55 AM   #2
Rick
Vikingsword Staff
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,339
Arrow

A tool / axe from lump copper ?
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 04:03 AM   #3
Rivkin
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
Default

pre-historic axe/knife ?
Rivkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 04:22 AM   #4
Conogre
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 371
Default

dino-poop?
Conogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 04:25 AM   #5
Jeff D
Member
 
Jeff D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 473
Default

Hide scraper

Jeff
Jeff D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 05:58 AM   #6
ariel
Member
 
ariel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
Default

Is it signed by Asadullah?
ariel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 02:25 PM   #7
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conogre
dino-poop?
LOL! I think that is what Andrew was getting at in his first post.

It is an Acheulean era hand axe or chopper found along the Omo river in Ethiopia (surface find). This is the same place were the oldest dated remains of Homo sapiens have been found, recently in the news because they were re-dated to 190,000 years ago, which I think 50 or 60,000 years older than originally thought.

This piece was not even made by a modern human, but by Homo erectus, somewhere between 1.5 million to 200,000 years ago.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 03:06 PM   #8
tom hyle
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 1,254
Default

That was my first thought, too, but isn't it small for the type?
tom hyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 03:56 PM   #9
Battara
EAAF Staff
 
Battara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,280
Default

So...I guess that means that it's not Moro.
Battara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 06:02 PM   #10
Mark
Member
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom hyle
That was my first thought, too, but isn't it small for the type?
Not really, if you consider the size of Homo erectus. It fits pretty nicely in my had, so I would acutally say that it is a little big. The picture is pretty much actual size. Other examples that I have handled (my Dad picked up three in the area -- I was too busy goofing around with by high school friends to look down), were about 3 inches long. I have also seen casts of some of about that size as well.

The more I look at it, the more I think I should give it to a museum, or maybe my alma mater. Its really a priceless artifact.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.