![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 306
|
![]()
Hello All!
Personally I think it's a Badik blade too. I think the balde is 19th century and the mounts are Mid 20th century. It's interesting how these parts get mixed and matched through out the region. Mark... Last edited by Aurangzeb; 11th January 2007 at 05:02 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 306
|
![]()
No new comments?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,235
|
![]()
The blade form and size makes me say badek too.
The scabbard looks a lot like early tourist goloks that were made approx 1900-1940. These tourist/souvenir items often had these type scbabbards combined with a simple golok blade or sometimes simple not laminated keris blade. The handle however would than often be a wayang figure. This handle is very different. is it the same wood as the scabbard ? It looks more rougher that the scabbard. Best regards, Willem |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 306
|
![]()
Hello Willem!
The scabbard and hilt are two entirely diffrent woods. the sheath looks newer and is not very well worn but the hilt is softer and battered. I think this might be collection of a tourist scabbard, Javanese hilt and a Badik blade that were just assembled in Malaysia. Mark.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|