![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
Maurice,
Here it is, my old simple kujang. I forgot I have one. ![]() After looking at my kujang again, yours may not necessary be a tombak-tip. Some kudi and kujang does have metuk-iras but are not tombak. Last edited by Alam Shah; 7th January 2007 at 08:08 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]()
If you're looking for Badek, here are some fine specimens.
![]() VVV's Badek Collection and 2 of my modest pieces. ![]() 1) Badek Bugis 2) Badek Bugis Sulawesi |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
![]()
You have a nice collection Alam.
I saw you also like martial arts. That's where my interests in indonesian weapons began. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
![]()
Hi,
I hope you've managed to identify the item. In case you haven't, I'd just like to say that, IMHO, it is definitely not a kujang or kudi as generally recognised by the Sunda. Its form doesn't have the right 'flow'; it's too 'rigid' (even for a Badek Patani or a Badik). The dapur is more akin to a 'Suduk Maru', which is not restricted to pedangs. Of note is that there doesn't appear to be a definite 'inclination'/'curving' of the back-edge w.r.t. the tang, as is characterised by all of the above implements. Hope it helps in some way. BTW,.. is this the one from Brunssum? Groeten ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,453
|
![]()
Hi Pangeran Datu,
Thanksfor your explanation. You're right. I'm the one from Brunssum. And you are????? ![]() (maybe the one from Heerlen????) ![]() groeten, Maurice Last edited by Javagolok; 23rd January 2007 at 10:06 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
![]()
Hi Maurice,
Just to stop you wondering... ![]() I'm not from the Netherlands at all; I'm from Australia. I hope you every success in finding a satisfactory answer to your search. Cheers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,013
|
![]()
I do not believe that this blade can be categorised as a kudi or kujang; it resembles no kudi, nor kujang, that I have ever seen.
The handle is a form that seems to be associated with North Jawa, and it is difficult to assess its age. It is most definitely not any type of tombak blade. I have seen similar blades that have been produced by the Suminep craftsmen and that combine features associated with a number of forms of traditional blade, or alternatively, with traditional blades and blades from outside Indonesian tradition. My gut feeling is that close examination would perhaps indicate that this is of recent Madura origin. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|