![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 3,191
|
![]() Quote:
Lew |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,855
|
![]()
Thanks Lew I can smile again now
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
![]()
First of all I am not sure it is not a local invention that just by the means of similar function resembles kindjal. Second, Sudan was a part of Ottoman Empire and, despite the Sassanid claims of the opposite, had no relationship to Iranic world.
In XIXth century Sudan was very pro-Ottoman because since Muhammed Ali it became a place where circassian officers were exiled for opposing Ali or the the presence of arabs in egyptian army. During Mahdist rebellion the "government" forces clashed with Mahdist; the corner of the former was formed by so called "Mexican' veterans (i.e. the unit lead by circassians who fought in Mexico as a part of french expeditionary force). Their Ottoman loyalty was well known, so again if something it is a continuation of Ottoman kindjal-like daggers. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|