![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Sorry forgot to send it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Thanks Ben,
Let's save the Batak Piso Podang vs Dayak Pedang and the origin of the Parang Nabur for another thread. ![]() Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Ok Michael
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Here is an unusual Mandau hilt variation that I think was influenced by the sword style we discussed?
Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Hi Michael this is an parang with mixed up style (but an very nice old one) not an mandau it does not have the classic mandau form
it has only an krowit that make it not an mandau but always difficult with these weapons to put an classification on it I have an straight parang nabur that is pictured in Zonnevelds Book wit an krowit Here some pics about an latok sadap and an very old style Jimpul with an Latok type handle . I have also an Dajak sword that has parang Latok type off handle that was taken in 1820 by an british officer you see that on your visit The handle s like this was the early form off handle they use Last edited by Dajak; 5th November 2006 at 12:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Here the pics
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
Hi Ben,
Yes, I agree that my parang does not follow the mandau classification strictly. Maybe better to call it a Dayak parang inspired by the Malay swords like yours? ![]() Both the blades you show are very interesting variations. The heavy Jimpul with Latok resembling handle is unique as far as I know. On the 1820 Dayak sword you showed me I think it's a Parang Pedang. Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|