![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]()
Here is a similar wire braid (without the twist) on a kris .
Sulu ? Maguindanao? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Hi Rick that is an nice could be used in North Borneo
I have an murut sword from North Borneo whit an moro Binding |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Murut
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,347
|
![]()
I tell you Dajak this Borneo/Sulu/Mindanao Moro line seems very blurred.
In a lot of ways the blade on the subject piece of this thread reminds me of a Bangkung. Sometimes I wonder if we will ever be able to sort it all out . ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Aussie Bush
Posts: 4,453
|
![]()
Rick:
IIRC bangkung is a Sulawesi term, at least that is how it appears to be characterized in v. Zonneveld. The blade form, however, is quite widespread -- from Sumatra to Borneo to Mindanao, as well as Sulawesi. In the Philippines, Cato states that the bangkung is mainly a weapon of the Yakan on Basilan. However, this blade form is seen quite commonly on Lumad swords of the Bagobo/Kaolu, while the ginunting of Negros Occidental (Visayas) also has some similarity to a bangkung. Ian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 951
|
![]()
Hi Ian
For us from overseas in the Netherlands we call all the Philipinne krissen Sundang moro krissen or moro kris sorry for that Don t keep the Zonneveld book to much as a reference on Borneo Items because he made a few mistakes in it that I already discussed with him . HE DID PUT WITH THE JIMPULS AN BLADE THAT IS NOT AN JIMPUL . I ASK HIM WHY YOU DO THIS HIS ; ...... ANSWER WAS I COULD NOT FIND ANY DOCUMENTATION ON THIS TYPE OFF SWORD ........ So in my opinnion do things like this is wrong . The problem with this now that some one with an blade form like pic 165 on page 57 thinks he have an Jimpul. regards Ben |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,637
|
![]()
I disagree a bit on some things that Ben brings up even if I agree with his other statements.
First I don't think that the parang from Nieuwenhuis is that close in style (first picture attached). Then I don't agree that f.i. searching the Leiden archives clearly proves that this sword is from Borneo? I have attached two pictures, the first collected on Borneo and the second in Jambi. There was a lot of migration in this region. If we can agree on that this isn't a Dayak sword, but Malay, then it could either have been brought to Borneo when somebody from Sumatra moved to Borneo? I assume that when people moved around between the islands they brought with them their weapons? Or it could have been produced in Borneo by a blademaker who had moved from Sumatra to Borneo? Does that make it a Borneo sword??? Is it the style or where it was produced that decides the origin? Is a balisong made by a Filipino in LA, in a traditional Filipino style, an American knife? The braiding I also think was made on Borneo. Depending on the scenarios it could have been made later or when produced. Michael PS Ben, I wanted to see the part of the blade closest to the tip. Last edited by VVV; 5th November 2006 at 08:17 AM. Reason: Wrong order of the Borneo/Jambi examples, sorry... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|