![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Which is the widest arrow that fits comfortably on your screen? | |||
1024 pixels |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 21.21% |
800 pixels |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 66.67% |
640 pixels |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 12.12% |
All are too large |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,725
|
![]()
Thank you very much, Gentlemen. Great information!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 932
|
![]()
Here is a picture of a well worn takouba hilt:
![]() The original image was 12 mb. The reduction above is just under 50 kb. About as much detail as a computer screen can display at intended size, but no more. I could zoom into the original as if I had a magnifying glass in my hand - but not this one. Looking at the poll above, I suspect we are heading to a new standard of 800 wide instead of 640. When I started this project in the age of dialup and most people running 640x480 screens, the design standard was 480 maximum width. Remember , if you do not have a good photo editor or time to learn to use it, you may still e-mail pictures to me. I will process them and mail the optimized images back to you. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|