![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
I'll go a step further and suggest that perhaps this sword comes from the Batak region of Sumatra.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,844
|
![]()
I wonder if this sword has a lot more to tell. To me it does not look used, though clearly an old piece. Also in a martial sense it does look a little awkward and the handle could be seen as not 100% functional for fighting. I get the feeling this is very high status, perhaps in a religious way. Could it be some sort of sacrificial sword or other emblem of ceremony.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
Adni has something fairly similar in form :
http://www.geocities.com/keris4u/oth...atak_lebar.htm And this hilt style resembles yours : http://www.geocities.com/keris4u/oth...ak_hatchet.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
Adni's more hatchet and has a horn hilt, mine is wood, but otherwise the blade carving near the ferrule, the figure on the hilt. even the hatching on the back of the blade. This piece and mine must have been made by the same people. I love Batak carving! I have a wonderful singha barong head about four feet tall that once stood guard with its buddy flanking a batak long house entryway. It is hanging in my solarium against a mirror. I really need to clean the mirror. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
The head is marvellous Bill!
![]() i would agree that the dress makers are very likely the same or related, but these are two very different weapons that i would image had different purposes, whether ritual or otherwise, so the term Ulu may or may not also apply to yours. The term may apply to the dress, but i don't think it applies to the blade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA Georgia
Posts: 1,599
|
![]() Quote:
Certainly the blade shape and probably purpose is different, but the blades have very similar characteristics. The tiny teeth like projections on the cutting edge near the hilts. The possibly talismanic markings on the backs of the blades. Both blades come out the sides of the scabbards. I'd say that the blades could have been made by the same guy. Certainly the same culture. Ulu could be "hatchet." I'd call it a Batak Parang, but I am open to other names and ideas. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
What a lovely carving .....4 foot tall.......fantastic. Love the sword too.
The functional design of the scabbard seems to allow two things......the scabbard mimics the blade almost exactly.....had it been a normal sheath the 'throat' would have to be quite wide, to allow withdrawal. It also allows a very 'quick draw' with minimal arm movement. Solarium......solarium...... here in Britain we're lucky if we even see the sun ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
The other parang on Adni's site also comes out the side of the scabbard and has a shape closer to yours, even thought the choice of dress decoration is different. He refers to that as parang sabit which if i understand his description properly means "top slide" which i suppose refers to the manner in which the blade is removed from the sheath. Maybe if Adni is out there he can shed some light on tese mysteries.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]() Quote:
I suspect that "ulu" is merely a form of the word "hulu" and in this case is perhaps referring to the dress with it's figurative hilt. Just a thought. ![]() Yeah Tim, i would say that the sheath does appear to be a representation of the naga. Not too surprising in this part of the world i suppose. What kind of elaboration were you looking for? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|