Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old Today, 01:57 AM   #15
RobT
Member
 
RobT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 649
Default I Think Both Are Weapons

Dave F,

Carrying a knife without a means of suspension is far easier than carrying a full length sword without same. Both your knife and your sword appear to have been made to be quite lethal, so I would hesitate to categorize either as symbolic. The sword blade appears to have a finely forged lenticular section and, frankly, is of far better quality than my example. I think that, if you examine the issue, you will find that no weapon achieves symbolic status without first being used in the culture as an actual weapon. Furthermore, weapons don’t become symbolic throughout a culture all at the same time. In some more regulated areas where the populations are subject to tighter authority, the weapon carry can become more symbolic than functional but, at the same time in less regulated areas, the same weapons are expected to function primarily as weapons and their symbolic nature is secondary. Given the quality of both your blades, I think it quite likely that they were both fully intended to be weapons.

Sincerely,
RobT
RobT is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.