![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 966
|
![]()
Yes, indeed, even a blind squirrel occasionally gets a nut and after 40 years of seeking there may even be a small stash.
The website did start out especially focused on European Medieval swords. A lonely focus. Daydreaming at a particularly irrelevant (to me) lecture at a professional conference, I developed a desire to advise aspiring collectors that there was a wide variety of exciting artifacts worthy of their attention. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 534
|
![]()
The main resource page is a bookmark I found through the Sir Clisto pages, so many decades ago.
I have studied here since. A jewel. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 141
|
![]() Quote:
- Mark |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bristol
Posts: 146
|
![]()
This is excellent. The kind of use of technology that takes us away from having to speculate, based upon other finds. Glad that your first sword turned out to be genuine. Love the shape - Oakeshott isn't my thing but it reminds me of the Wallace Collection late C14th A460 which I got my hands on a few months ago.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 966
|
![]()
A big surprise for me as well, though I suspect more will be found as additional collections are surveyed with this technology. My survey was designed to disclose elemental variations associated with pattern-welding and iron inlays and I'll share those findings here in due course.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 235
|
![]()
That's awesome. And I'm sure a great feeling. Thanks for sharing this with everyone!
Could you share any closer pictures of the subject area on your first example? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rhineland
Posts: 378
|
![]()
What amazing findings Lee! Thank you for sharing and also from my site congrats that the sword shown first is authentic!
Best regards Andreas |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,064
|
![]()
Hi Lee, super interesting! Could you please tell me more about the technique used and what all the numbers mean?
The first sword looks good and authentic in the photo, in my humble opinion. What were your concerns there? vbw, Jasper |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 966
|
![]()
Thank you Gentlemen!
The numbers on the 'maps' are the points where a reading was taken. I was using an Olympus Vanta handheld XRF device, so the 'points' measured are of about a quarter of an inch in diameter or so. This instrument will download a file of the device's interpretation that may be imported into a spreadsheet for manipulation (as well as the raw spectra data, should one have the skill to interpret that) and I can then note functional location and features and sort the array of readings by that, as the numbers label the lines in the spreadsheet. It gets overwhelming quickly and the interpretations presented in this thread are merely "was gold detected - yes (a gold dot on the spot) or no. As I prepared this reply I returned to the spreadsheet to get the composition of the latten (medieval brass) of the inlay and then I noted that lead accompanied the gold where it was found. (Fortunately, the Internet led me to an academic paper explaining how this could improve adhesion of the gilding.) By the way, should you be curious, the latten was 65% copper, 34% zinc and 1% lead, rounding to the nearest percent. I will explain more about my methodology when I present my upcoming thread on elements associated with iron inlays and pattern-welding. My concerns for authenticity arose from 1) I bought this sword in the late 1980s at a gun show in the US admittedly from a British dealer that I had dealt with previously and 2) a few bladesmiths of my acquaintance had expressed concern about what they felt was a lack of robustness of the tang. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|