Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 1st October 2025, 08:39 PM   #1
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,616
Default

Thats a really good observation Rick! In looking at the example posted, all the attention to the upper part of the blade, with it gradually tapering to a point does bring to mind the colichemarde, again recalling these kinds of influences.

However the 'colichemarde' was strictly an epee of small sword type for dueling, with the upper part of the blade intended for parry in blade to blade combat, with the forward part still narrow and intended for thrusting.
The Spaniards stubbornly held to their mysterious 'destreza' style of fence, which focused on posturing and thrusting attacks.

The French were for faster lighter swords, both cut and thrust, and indeed full blade contact.

This much heavier blade and hilt form were intended for a degree of combat, but not in the sense of fencing. Ive been studying these situations a bit lately toward the use of dueling swords in California in this period, which means Im just a little less perplexed
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.