![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,279
|
![]()
My theory is that there was a wooden haft that went through the middle of the heavy hoe shaped implement and that it was lashed onto the shaft, through the cleat, pulling it down, locking it to the handle and securing it against any downward strikes.This is just my guess, not based on anything.
The only hole that goes all the way through is the one for the handle. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,884
|
![]()
If you can tell if they are bone and not ivory they could be from Tierra del Fuego. The side lashing I believe is more of a South American method rather than Inuit. Just a suggest no expert. They are a rather cool collection of artifact and if from Tierra del Fuego I would think them rather rare too. Inuit ice axes.
Last edited by Tim Simmons; 25th August 2025 at 02:26 PM. Reason: Spelling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,279
|
![]()
From my view,I definitely believe them to be bone.The lashing looks like it could work on my piece, the only exception is that my implement has a provision for a haft to be inserted inside it whereas the examples you provided,I believe are laid on top of the handle and lashed onto it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,353
|
![]()
I think Drac's item is Walrus Ivory. I only used Fish Bone as a euphemism for the material. If you look at the end that is narrower, where it is cut, you can see the dentine core of the tusk.
Last edited by Rick; Yesterday at 01:03 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,279
|
![]()
Rick, are you talking about the smaller piece or both of them?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|