Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23rd August 2025, 07:53 PM   #1
mgolab
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radboud View Post
I agree with Robert; it's a pre-pattern British sword dating to around the 1780s. The Crown over G could be for Thomas Gill; I believe that he used a stamp like that before 1800.

If you search the Royal Armouries online catalogue, you'll find several examples of similar-looking swords described as "Light cavalry trooper sword". Although they have langets and the blades are different. You may also want to consider that the blade on your sword has been shortened.
would you say it is infantry or naval?
mgolab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2025, 04:34 PM   #2
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,547
Default

As the infantry in the British army ceased carrying the sword c 1784, the only option would be perhaps this could be an officers fighting sword with perhaps a heirloom blade.

I am thinking perhaps this might be a private purchase naval sword as the straight blade corresponds to the naval cutlass (with sheet guard) c. 1804, but that just as all ideas must be pure speculation.

There are many variables with swords and their ersatz versions often comprised of various components, especially in these times, so hard to say without provenance.

To illustrate this 'phenomenon', this is a British military basket hilt, munitions grade by Jeffries, London who was a cutler producing swords with these type hilts, notably for the Black Watch c. 1750s.
When the Black Watch was in America as the Revolution ended, these were turned in and went into stores.
Apparently, there were several cases in later years where M1788 light cavalry blades were mounted into these hilts (I have seen 2, possibly 3 including mine).
There is no way to assess what these were intended for, possibly fighting swords for officers in Highland regiments? Naturally, there are no official records.

These kinds of anomalies are fascinating, and often offer compelling possibilities, but still speculation.
Attached Images
 
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2025, 06:02 AM   #3
Radboud
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgolab View Post
would you say it is infantry or naval?
Difficult to say, lots of different services used swords. There's a similar looking sword described as used by the foot artillery in "Swords of the British Army" by Brian Robson.

The customs service also carried swords at this time as did some hospital staff or prison guards.
Radboud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2025, 01:44 PM   #4
mgolab
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 111
Default

Thank you. If possible can you post the image from that book? I do not have access to it.
mgolab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2025, 10:00 AM   #5
Radboud
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 289
Default

page 233
Attached Images
 
Radboud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2025, 07:07 AM   #6
Hotspur
Member
 
Hotspur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nipmuc USA
Posts: 528
Default

I would agree with British artillery but I thought there was a precursor to that plate. As far as short straight hangers, there were a lot of varied like a couple of mine. There is a reproduction of this type.

It may be from the 1812-1818 war with England.

Cheers
GC
Attached Images
 
Hotspur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2025, 03:15 PM   #7
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,547
Default

I think Radboud is onto it. The close in quillon and hilt form are compellingly similar.
In my desperate research trying to identify a briquet that was listed as a foot artillery gunners sword in the early references on British military swords and in Blair ("European and American Arms", 1962), I found there was NO such pattern or issue of such a sword.

The only foot artillery swords were the Dundas or Spanish.

The blade on this example is 18th c. and would have to be 1780s-90s for it to be Thomas Gill's. By early 19th during the presumed period of these 'foot artillery' swords shown in the Robson plate are likely War of 1812 as Glen suggests . By then John Gill was the maker for the Gill's.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.