Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old Yesterday, 11:13 PM   #4
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,477
Default

Thanks Keith!
What I meant was that the cross on the ULFBERHT word on the blades had NOTHING to do with Christianity in the religious sense. It was entirely a symbolic gesture much in the manner of runes as far as the Vikings perceived. In fact many of the curious geometric etc markings on reverse of many of these blades seem to have derived from Glagolitic and runic symbols.

While the Vikings were not Christianized, Latin, the language of the Church was a lingua francia of the times, so the cross symbol itself was not perceived necessarily as religious, but as noted more an administrative element. If seen magically, or as invocation it was part of talismanic convention rather than religious.

These swords marked Ulfberht were used by many Vikings, but again, not all Scandinavians were Vikings.......these swords were Frankish, virtually none ever made in those countries.

thank you for coming in on this! Your intense research on this history and metallurgy are so valuable, and honestly way outside my pay grade!
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.