![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 64
|
![]()
Thank you both for the responses. I received it yesterday. Definitely not a boarding axe, but fairly sure some type of weapon.
Hand forged steel. Handle is old, along with langets. Feels like a weapon in hand. Overall length is 18 inches. Length of head is 6 inches x 2.75. Overall weight is 1 pound, 3 oz. Blade is very thin. The eye walls are too thin for a type of tool. Found in Pennsylvania. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 64
|
![]()
I attempted to take a picture to show the thinnest of the blade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,156
|
![]()
The haft does indeed look very old. It could perhaps be a 'field piece', a primitive type spike axe/tomahawk. The langets not typical for -hawks, but there are so many variations based on the smith. It could still be a much earlier repurposed piece as well. I see what you mean about the thinning of the eye-
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 64
|
![]()
Thanks again Mark for the comments. I found the attached image, No. 42, on the right, from the old book Armouries in the Tower of London. I though it bears some resemblance.
I gently cleaned the axe up a bit and, interestingly, the cutting edge and spike, appear to be forge welded in steel. The rest of the head what appears to be iron. Curious piece, in my opinion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 64
|
![]()
Also not sure whether this is a faded maker's mark. Hard to tell.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 355
|
![]()
Yes, definitely looks more like a weapon with that thinness of blade, lightness helps with speed.
Fire axes/hatchets tend to be chunkier designed to break through doors or open up the roof to let smoke out. So, not a fire axe after all. Normal, of course, to have a steel insert for the blade. Unusual that the spike maybe steel as well. Sorry, can't help with the maker's mark. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|