![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
OK S.Al-Anizi Thankyou, all info is of intrest to me.
Thanks DrDavid , yes the 1888 & 1903 have always been may favorite English bayonets, But although I have had many this is my first keeper amongst them. ![]() From the rivets its not the mk.1 or mk.4 I think? but it doesnt have an oil/cleaning hole so its not quite the same as the English models. its The Royal Afghans interpritation. I would guees a modified mk.2 perhaps? I understand they were used on the Afghan Martini-Henrys out there, rather than the lee metfords. I have compared it with British made ones & its a very close copy in dimensions etc, I had to examine with a 9x lens to be certain it wasnt British made. But I am sure a true bayonet collector would know at a glance. Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 228
|
![]()
Is it possible that the glottal sound on the first K is rather a number (6)? Might be referring to the army unit which it belonged. Just a thought though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,712
|
![]()
Thanks Zifir .... S.Al-Anizi,
Interesting, I dont know if it will help explain the markings, re.military etc. but heres another set of bayonet tang markings from the same era in Afghanistan, sadley this one isnt mine though. Perhaps that helps with your insights? ![]() Spiral |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|