![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
Rick,
If you're really interested with this, have you considered using the Japanese way of dating blades according to tang corrosion. I dont know but it may work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 31
|
Thought this might be possibly interesting to the discussion. Certain similarities caught my eye. From the calendar of Georgian weapons just posted by Rivkin. Labeled as 12-13th century. The hilt looks like it could possibly work on the type of tang on the blade under discussion. Of course I can't see if it's peened or not...
Anyways though it was worth adding to the mix of possibilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arabia
Posts: 278
|
Ian, I dont think that this sword is possibly of Georgian origin. First, its wootz, I dont know if Georgian smiths worked with that metal or not, but I dont think so. Also, the tang on Rick's blade is too short for such a hilt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 655
|
Until 12th century Tbilisi was an arab colony; Caucasus was a battlefield between arabs, locals, northern steppe people - alans and khazars and later turkoman-seljukes.
Attached are arab-influenced christian georgians, VI-XIth centuries, and an arab from arabia-iraq, XIth century. These are the nearly the only swords I was able to find that virtually do not taper. And yes, georgians did use wootz. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|