![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 22
|
![]()
It is known that Le Page used to produce all guns for Napoleon's personal use, as being preferred by him to those of Boutet, due to a flaw in their nechanism.
Interesting comment Fernando. Why would Napoleon grant Boutet an 18 year concession as Director Artiste of the Versailles Manufactory to manufacture Armes Deluxe and military arms if Boutet's firearms were flawed? Between 1800-1813 the Versailles Manufactory delivered 10,000 muskets and musketons to the grenadiers and chasseurs of Imperial Guard. (Dean Taylor Arms Collecting Vol.20 No.4 1982). Napoleon also commissioned Boutet to produce arms for his family, Marshals of the Empire and other people important to him. Jean LePage produced superb and beautiful firearms but, other than your comment, I have not found any evidence to suggest that his firearms were technically superior to those of Boutet. Can this statement be supported with evidence? Respectfully Mike Barnett Perth Western Australia |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
Yet the full reading was: ... Those from Boutet were the ones that Napoleon offered because he called them "fusil de vitrine" (showcase). Good to see but not to use. The angle of the flint's impact was very steep, which broke the dog's neck very easily. This did not happen to LePage's weapons ... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|