![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 187
|
![]()
Thanks Jim,
Here are a couple of the photos of him in Crimea taken by Fenton. In the group photo he is the guy straddling the chair and in the other he is in the middle, lounging in the wheelbarrow. As you say this isn't the sword he carried in the charge, but it would seem to be the sword he wished he'd had. He even had it service sharpened. Cheers, Bryce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,193
|
![]()
He looks like a pretty burly guy! and no doubt was quite a swordsman! strictly business. I found it interesting that the sword he was carrying in the charge was noted as more substantial than the others typically carried at that time.
Could he have had an 1853? Sounds like his dander was up pretty good as the 4th stormed through the guns, and the Russian gunners were scrambling as he took out eleven! It sounds suspect that such a specific number is given.....but what is certain is that he must have seemed a demon from hell to those guys as he tore through them. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 187
|
![]()
G'day Jim,
Low's nickname was "Beefy". There is a photo of him with a sword taken in 1854. I don't know if I have permission to share it, so I will hold off posting it. When you zoom in on the hilt, it looks to be either a 4 bar hilt or even possibly a symmetrical hilt. The resolution isn't the best, so I can't be certain, but it does look to be non-regulation as described. Cheers, Bryce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|