|
|
|
19th December 2023, 12:24 PM
|
#1 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Terrible pictures indeed, Ken. They make part of the contents, partizans and all, to look like 'not the real thing' stuff
 .
|
|
|
|
19th December 2023, 08:29 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 543
|
Hi Fernando
Do you think it is all reproduction? thanks Ken |
|
|
|
|
19th December 2023, 08:41 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 131
|
Hello,
nteresting lot, Maybe some are 19th century Earlier ?? Why cannot your friend do or ask for better and separated pictures ? We could clearly see ... |
|
|
|
|
20th December 2023, 03:21 AM
|
#4 |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
|
The lance head and socket bayonets are of course 19th c. The other polearm heads may be OK but hard to say. the guy might have stacked them tighter and but more boxes and odds and ends over the heap....just for ambiance.
|
|
|
|
21st December 2023, 08:46 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Ireland
Posts: 543
|
Some better pics at last
I think there is some good age to them myself The ones in the first pic with "You 3 Minutes ago" on top of pic are the ones I like opinions welcome Regards Ken |
|
|
|
|
21st December 2023, 11:06 AM
|
#6 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Well, this changes the whole perspective. They do look real, at least a good part of them.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
