![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]() Quote:
Of course there are also other staining methods used on Malay Peninsula, with contrast being not so bold. I suppose the Sundang in the picture from 1907 has a lighter stain, and Albert's Sundang here has traces of what seems to be an older stain: http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showth...=Malay+sundang |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,992
|
![]()
Re my post #13
"The keris with 7 luk & twist core presents every indication that it is 19th century Brunei. My opinion in this case is based on a similar keris that I have in my care & that was the state execution keris of Brunei, dating from 1842, and the fact that the only other keris of this type that I have handled also came from Brunei." I have had a chance to get back to my notes, I have in fact seen several of this type of keris, but have only handled two, mine & one other. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,273
|
![]()
Alan,
I guess, this Sundang could be quite similar to your specimen from Brunei. I understand why certain people would attribute it to a Madura smith. I am quite sure, there were Madura smiths working on Peninsula too. On the other hand, wasn't Jasper&Pirngadie writing about smiths from Terengganu working in malay parts of Borneo? Some kind of geographical loop, which is very acceptable. Sundang from #11 has a quite distinct Luk shape, and this Luk shape points to Terengganu. Kembang Kacang is different from the example I posted here below. Its sheath is (or better say, was, for antique examples) specifically Kelantan, which borders to Terengganu. By the way, that Sundang from #11 is Luk 5, not 7. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|