![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 5,503
|
![]()
Fully agree with Tim and Marius' opinions.
Sometimes we all go outside of our "historical, fighting, bloody" frame of mind and get attracted by the artistic quality. This one gets very high marks in that department. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Thank you dear members for your comments !
Here for share two other pictures of the disassembled parts of the small sword ( was slightly moving...) and the interesting hilt and wooden scabbard structure Kind regards |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,194
|
![]()
As well observed by everyone here already, this is most clearly a dress item which is of course likely for a naval officer as shown by the fouled anchor on the blade. These kinds of items were sometimes diplomatically oriented as the trade and other relations with Dutch and British were notable in Ceylon and these regions through the 19th century (of course these historically were from earlier centuries) and into 20th.
As Ariel has well noted, while we focus typically on the obviously combative qualities of weapons, often these kinds of pieces are fascinating for their artistic merits. The artisans of Sri Lanka (Ceylon) were always celebrated for the beautiful weaponry they produced that were important accoutrements for the royal figures and officials there. The kastane itself, the sword this is based on, was a court or official dress sword rather than a combat weapon, though it was typically mounted with Dutch or British hanger blades. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|