![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello David,
Quote:
Quote:
I'd be inclined to believe that this blade originally came with the hilt. It just got mutilated in modern times by a heavy acid etch, some additional cuts into the back and tip, and another round of acid to remove signs of manipulation and staining the blade. Not much that can be done at this point except than replacing the mutilated blade with a well-fitting antique blade; not easy to obtain any mandau blade of suitable style and with correct dimensions though. As long as you manage keeping it in the scabbard, the current blade may do, indeed. Regards, Kai |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Keris forum moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 7,211
|
![]()
While i agree that more photos would confirm or deny my suspicion, i'm not sure what photo you are looking at that could lead you to believe there is a concave/convex construction here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Well, the side shown doesn't show any sign of a bevel and the etched surface may still be slightly concave from what I seem to fathom. While this is not final proof, I'm pretty convinced that the other side will exhibit a convex surface with pronounced bevel.
Jef, could you please post a pic of the other side of this blade? Regards, Kai |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|