Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > European Armoury
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12th October 2022, 09:50 AM   #1
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default The name game...

Quote:
Originally Posted by midelburgo View Post
... I understand that a gun with the characteristics of the first gun with servers in Fernando post, will fall in the mentioned table under "cerbatana"...
The caption in the previously posted example clearly define it as an esmeril. Perhaps the author was wrong ... or not. Maybe not so easy to figure out which is which among the universe of early gun variations. On the other hand, cerbatana, in Portuguese zarabatana, is basically a blowgun; go figure.
Easier to take into account is the difference in size betweeen a 1/4 pound shot and a six pound... for what matters.


.
Attached Images
   

Last edited by fernando; 12th October 2022 at 10:03 AM.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2022, 09:39 PM   #2
midelburgo
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 264
Default

I took a shot of the table at the Olesa Muñido book. This is only for XVI and XVIIth centuries.
Attached Images
 
midelburgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2022, 10:05 AM   #3
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Excelent material; will safe to my files.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2022, 08:00 PM   #4
Jim McDougall
Arms Historian
 
Jim McDougall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by midelburgo View Post
I took a shot of the table at the Olesa Muñido book. This is only for XVI and XVIIth centuries.

Im with Fernando! very valuable material! Thank you so much! will also add to my files!
While 16th and 17th c. these guns were often in use far longer than just generations, which was why they were so valued.
Jim McDougall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2022, 10:58 AM   #5
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Not to forget that, Portuguese typologies of this period (and not only) had plenty (most) gun types coinciding with those from Spain but also had different ones, both only with a different name and others with different characteristics. A pity i don't know of a source where they are all listed in one table.
There was the 48 pounder bronze LEÃO (lion), the IV century stone shot CÃO (dog) larger than the Berço and no curved tail, the CAMELO (camel) and the CAMELETE, equivalent to a 1/3 stone shot Cannon, the stone shot ÁSPIDE, equivalent to half bastard culverin, the ESPERA (wait) equivalent to 1/3 cannon, the impressive ESPALHAFATO (great fuss) also denomitaded TOURO (wild bull) that threw a 92 Kilos (over 200 pouds) stone ball. And so on ...
Despite the of Portuguese arsenals patrimony was devastated by Acts of God (1755 earthquake), and 'borrowed' by dominating powers, one of the greatest bronze cannon collections in the world is kept in the pateo of the Lisbon Military Museum and also in its galeries.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2022, 03:23 PM   #6
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

If i may still assault Jim's thread, this is the Vasco da Gama room in the Lisbon Military Museum, where all the types mentioned in my previous post (and more) are exhibited.


.
Attached Images
     
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2023, 05:11 PM   #7
LouG
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 5
Default Spanish Culverins of the XVI Century

Gentlemen---In reading your most interesting posts, I gather that what we call a "culverin" is termed in Spanish a "culebrina", and if so, these "culebrinas" (based on the Olesa Munido page posted by Midelburgo) were made in a range of sizes, small as well as large. I mention this because the books on artillery I have here all describe a culverin as a big gun; but a particular episode of 1590 concerning a Spanish military action in present-day New Mexico seems to preclude the possibility that the culverins involved were big, heavy pieces. So the specific question is: in Spanish military parlance of the late XVI Century, a "culebrina" could be as small as a falcon, correct?
LouG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2023, 06:28 PM   #8
fernando
(deceased)
 
fernando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
Default

Welcome to the forum, Lou . The section on the left of thr chart that encompasses culverins is more a generic for guns basic typology. In fact, and as you may see in the 'class' column, culverins and half culverins are long barreled pieces with a significant reach. Also you may see in the chart that a (legit) culverin is over four times heavier than a falcon.
As per the term, culverin in English, Colubrina in Spanish and Portuguese and Couleuvrine in French, derive from the Latin term for Cobra (snake). As you well know, in an early stage artillery pieces were given animal names.
fernando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2023, 08:16 PM   #9
LouG
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 5
Default Spanish Artillery

Thanks for your note, Fernando. And yes, I see your point. But here's the story, and it presents a puzzle.

In 1590 a Spanish expedition made up of about 170 soldiers and civilians under Castano de Sosa worked its way north from Mexico well into present-day New Mexico. With the expedition were a number of wheeled vehicles---ox-drawn carretas, and two culverins. Much of the ground was rough, and the journalist repeatedly mentions the breaking of carreta wheels or axles (but nothing specific here about the culverins). When they reached the great multi-story Pueblo of Pecos (near present Santa Fe, New Mexico), there was a sharp battle with the occupants, during which the maese de campo ordered four men "...to climb to the top with one of the artillery pieces. The men did so, although with much difficulty, because the Indians were harrying them fiercely..."

So we see that these "culverins" were pulled a long way over rough ground with no special problem, and even hauled up the side of a pueblo during a battle. Therefore, I doubt that they were true full-size culverins, and were probably something considerably smaller. But.....quien sabe?
LouG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.