Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Ethnographic Weapons
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 5th August 2022, 08:20 PM   #1
gp
Member
 
gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gp View Post
talking about a variant or (to me a little at least) strange is this one I just puchased

Indeed a bichaq but not the regular "warrior" or combattant one, nor the one for ceremonial purposes (like after the Habsburg annexation).

Why?
Simple; its size is too small / short.

Dimensions:
total length 21,0 cm with scabbard
blade 19,5 cm - width 1,8 cm
handle/grip 9,5 cm

strange in my opinion is the handle /grip : not the typical "yataghan"type but an animal (looks like a deer)

at those time you didn't had such a thing like "artistic" freedom , nor where the makers that couageous or daring to try such a thing.. Specially in the Ottoman times. My guess would be that it was made for a child of either a (very) rich merchant or aristocrat in the Balkans.


remark: the decoration on the ferrule is very fine and not seen or hardly on bichaqs as is on this one...
the metal scabbard looks "scruffy"but my guess is that the leather on it has disappeared, hence leaving it "naked"


What do you think ?
update on the "scruffy":

after it arrived i noticed the metallic little look at some spots on the scabbard were actually silver ! So no leather like some bichaqs have.
The complete scabbard has been silverplated originally and sadly it disaapeared through time.
Looking at the size, the "deer" hilt, I think a nobleman or rich merchand had it made for his son pre 1878, not in the Habsburg but Ottoman era.
gp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2022, 08:40 PM   #2
gp
Member
 
gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 887
Default

a new one which I hardly have seen:
the round top of the hilt / grip and not "fancied up" with metallic support or decoration.
Be it as support of the blade or just as an additional decoration.
Total lenght: 36 cm, bichaq only 35 cm

Judging by the decorations on the blade, this looks exactly the same like the Sarajevo ones I have prior the Austrian occupation in 1878 or the latest in the transition 1878.
So definetly Ottoman period, which I would judge timewise between 1850-1870.

The round top reminds me of the Ottoman gravestones in Bosnia, specially in Sarajevo which were in Ottoman times decorated with this turban-like decoration at the top, which looks similar here with the bichaq...

Your thoughts please, what do you think ? or is it just a misplaced silly and wrong assumption ?
Attached Images
           

Last edited by gp; 13th August 2022 at 11:54 PM.
gp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2023, 07:23 PM   #3
gp
Member
 
gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 887
Default

just received my new bichaq of the non yataghan type blade; a triangle one.

You do not see these "triangle"ones that often and in the forum I only saw one example in member Valjhun's collection posted 2008 http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showpo...8&postcount=23

my previous posted and 2 other ones are one from Sarajevo and Foca 1890.

This one is from Foca as well but no date on the blade.

Does any forum memeber have a traingle one and if positive:

- kindly requested to give me the specs / dimensions
- show us a picture

thank you very much !☼
Attached Images
       

Last edited by gp; 2nd July 2023 at 07:38 PM.
gp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2024, 08:12 AM   #4
gp
Member
 
gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 887
Default

Two nice pieces :

a nice Bosniakenmesser / bichaq with a blade of 35 cm and wooden copper covered scabbard

and the second is a long dagger which based on its lenght I never have seen before;
Total 45,5cm with scabbard, witouth 40 cm and blade 27 cm .
Scabbard is made out of wood, leather cover and metal / iron at end and top.


Has any of you seen the 2nd long type before or have you one in your collection ? in the latter case, kindle requested to provide a picture, thank you
Attached Images
       

Last edited by gp; 12th June 2024 at 08:16 AM. Reason: qq
gp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2025, 10:20 PM   #5
Pitt1999
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 113
Default

I’ve got a few of these but these examples are the standouts in my group. Not necessarily for their quality, but for their interesting characteristics.
Attached Images
           
Pitt1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2025, 06:19 PM   #6
gp
Member
 
gp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt1999 View Post
I’ve got a few of these but these examples are the standouts in my group. Not necessarily for their quality, but for their interesting characteristics.
don't underestimate yours; the quality is good to very good.

Forget about Bosnian scabbards, always the poorer part as it is just very thin copper on wood ( and not the best strongest wood I dare say).
Hardly to find an undamaged scabbard.

The knives or daggers though are very interesting; can you tell us a little more? like lengths, width and such? Much obliged !
gp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2025, 03:14 AM   #7
Pitt1999
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gp View Post
don't underestimate yours; the quality is good to very good.

Forget about Bosnian scabbards, always the poorer part as it is just very thin copper on wood ( and not the best strongest wood I dare say).
Hardly to find an undamaged scabbard.

The knives or daggers though are very interesting; can you tell us a little more? like lengths, width and such? Much obliged !
I've added some photos that show the lengths of each of these knives. Interestingly they are all nearly the same in terms of blade width, all about 1 inch wide with almost negligible variation.

I got lucky with the two knives that I call either bird beak pommels or frog mouth pommels. They were purchased at two different times from two different sellers.

The other two are quite odd (to me at least) in the world of Bosnian bichaqs. The boxy bone hilted bichaq lacks the refinement these knives normally have. As you can see the hilt is very square and the "bolster" is just pieces of copper/brass pinned to the tang. The scabbard is also very basic being a sheet of copper/brass formed to the shape of the blade with very thin wood shims friction fit inside to help retain the blade. The contrast is the very nice engraving of "Sarajevo" on one side of the scabbard.

The horn hilted bichaq stands out by having the previously noted horn hilt. It is also a simple hilt, lacking ears or another form of shaped pommel normally seen on these knives. The horn scales are also mostly unadorned with only three small unknown red inserts on each side of the hilt. The scabbard is some type of thin iron/steel sheet that was either painted or otherwise blackened over a wood core. I am unsure if this scabbard is original to this knife however. The scabbard was clearly carved to accept the bolster but when sheathing the knife it is stopped before the bolster can go in, but far enough to where the blade is completely sheathed. The fit is good and tight though so this was probably an error during manufacture. I also got a slightly better picture of this knives mark, which is quite different from the usual shamshir mark normally seen on these.
Attached Images
         
Pitt1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.