![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I thought that the odds have shown us that the stylized figure is not a '3' but a 'Z', as approached now and a while back ![]() And yes, the foggy pictures provided show no evidence of the discussed mark being that of one of the suggested smiths, also as here approached ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|