![]()  | 
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#21 | |
| 
			
			 (deceased) 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Portugal 
				
				
					Posts: 9,694
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  . I thought that the odds have shown us that the stylized figure is not a '3' but a 'Z', as approached now and a while back  .And yes, the foggy pictures provided show no evidence of the discussed mark being that of one of the suggested smiths, also as here approached  .
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |