![]()  | 
	
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Upstate New York, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 970
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I do not ever hold high expectations of interesting swords showing up at a nearby general and estate sale auction that I frequent. Though one of a group of four Chinese swords in a recent sale appeared interesting from the teaser photo, my low expectations almost meant I did not attend the preview, but then I went along with a friend who wanted to buy something else that he did not bid on after seeing problems with it that were not evident from the pictures. 
		
		
		
			The first of these swords was a very nicely made and mounted jian with a stainless steel blade, clearly recent. That left three dao all, upon closer examination, with laminated steel blades. I pursued the two longer examples successfully and left the shorter ring pommel to a competing underbidder who never claimed his purchases and so I ultimately bought the ring pommel when it was re-auctioned. All of these three swords appear to me to have older blades that have been refurbished by polishing of the blades and rewrapping of the hilts. I turned to Peter Dekker’s excellent essay to refresh myself on what these were. My favorite from the start, the longest, at bottom in the group images, appears to be a yànmáodāo (goose quill saber) by curvature or a yútóudāo (fish head saber) by profile with a concave back false edge from the rise on the back. The middle one also has a brisk turn-up in the distal curvature of the blade, but there is a very gentle curvature proximal to that so I suspect this would best be called a liuyèdāo (willow leaf saber) rather than being another goose quill example. This blade seems to have been in the worst condition of the group prior to its repolishing. I’ll appreciate any further insights members may wish to provide.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Lee, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I am intrigued by the chape of the second from the top sword: it is very different from what I am accustomed to see on European and Indo-Persian scabbards. Are there examples of a similar appearance elsewhere except for China? Was it an established Chinese pattern? In other words, where was it invented and was it adopted by other cultures? Thanks, Ariel  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Upstate New York, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 970
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I can provide a more detailed image, which I have done below, but unfortunately I am ignorant of the origins of the design. A few other dao in my collection have somewhat fancier and shorter metal encasements of the scabbard tip while this one is longer and less wide. 
		
		
		
			Hopefully Philip, who wrote one of the articles I consulted, or another member may be able to give an informed answer.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Upstate New York, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 970
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			So, no interest in or comment on these swords? Are they all very, very recent 'fakes' - I am not afraid that I was 'taken' as I do not have a lot invested in them. So, please, enlighten me!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I know, it is a frustrating experience to show a sword for discussion and get zero responses. In your case it is not so much lack of interest in a particular posting as the lack of knowledge about the general topic (thin line berween the two but you understand my meaning) I can hardly remember anyone on this forum dedicated to Chinese swords. Your query can be professionally answered only by a Chinese-focused person, and I can recall only one,- Peter Dekker. Certainly there are others in the general arms-collecting community, but I just do not know of them. Sorry for being of no use.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: What is still UK 
				
				
					Posts: 5,925
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Lack of knowledge indeed.  I had a huge good steel, two handed Chinese sword with a long rectangular red painted handle.  A brass circular loose fitting guard.  Your usual militaria people would say this is just a show theatre sword.  I now deeply regret letting it go for very little.  If you have a hunch don't be fooled by lore and the uniformed.  Hang on to it until sure.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			 (deceased) 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Portugal 
				
				
					Posts: 9,694
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			How about PhilipTom; i guess he didn't notice this thread... yet !
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Sep 2021 
				Location: Leiden, NL 
				
				
					Posts: 617
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Lee, what a great scoop.  Amazing how this stuff gets around. I know the ring pommeled one well, it was owned by a collector in Hawaii in the 1970s.  It was in ratty shape when he got it, the wood grip almost rotted away and lots of pitting on the blade.   I did the polish that you see now.   Also made the storage scabbard, it's not historical in style, just a functional thing to protect a sharp and freshly polished edge.  Had to re-manufacture the entire wood grip, and put the braided cloth wrapping patterned after an original.   The owner didn't want the fabric "antiqued" since he was concerned about it later being passed off as old.    Am so glad it's in your hands now!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  )  The grip wrap is new, it looks like the work done by a guy here is southern CA who's very good from a technical standpoint but he didn't have the sources in China to get the authentically-woven stuff that Peter Dekker has access to; what you see looks like a close nylon facsimile in terms of width and thickness.The iron fittings, heavily corroded, appear en suite and most likely original to the saber, which was probably carried by a lower-echelon field officer. A lot of these old rusty iron fittings were once decorated with silver koftgari, but the corrosion pretty much killed it off (iron and silver are an unstable combo anyway, the reason that Indian and "Islamic" weapons are more often seen with better-preserved gold than silver koftgari on hilts). The profile and style of the scabbard is correct. This is a nice example of a Qing military saber, I would estimate its date to be mid-18th to the turn of the 19th. You see the same pattern depicted in Qianlong-era military portraits and battle scenes, the most accurately-rendered ones based on sketches by Jesuit missionaries who sometimes accompanied the campaigns as documentarians. It is also illustrated in Fr Joseph Amiot's (very rare) book on all things China, his chapter on military affairs even quotes from Qing production manuals regarding the materials and manufacture of army equipment. The regulation styles changed in the 19th cent., favoring brass for most types, with bulbous pommels, oval-section sheath and grip, and rounded scabbard chapes.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | 
| 
			
			 (deceased) 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Portugal 
				
				
					Posts: 9,694
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: Ann Arbor, MI 
				
				
					Posts: 5,503
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Since Philip Tom with his vast knowledge of Eastern weapons has joined the discussion, I would like to re-address my question to him:  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	- what are his thoughts about the peculiar form of the chape of the scabbard belonging to the second from the top sword? Is it specifically Chinese or was it employed in other cultures?  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | |
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Upstate New York, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 970
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I have attached an image of the pommel showing the peening of the tang in the sword with later cupronickel mountings as you have suggested. I refer to my collection of about a dozen Chinese swords as my "accidental" collection as for whatever reason, knowledge about them was pretty scarce in my earlier collecting days and so I never actively sought them. I guess a number of other collectors were influenced by the same information void. Fortunately a few really nice examples did find me over the years (via Scott Rodell, the Yaroms and Peter Dekker) but a number were chance encounters. I remember a dealer in Brimfield once 'begging" me to take a pair of Chinese swords, a big ring pommel and a big ox-tail at $75 each, if I recall correctly. I suspected they were recent and artificially aged, but I took them home anyway as he had done me well on another item. Months later, I examined them with more care and realized they were decent antiques!  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | |
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Thanks for the photo. The appearance of the peened iron doesn't have the color and texture of something that's been accumulating patina over as many years as that blade is likely to have been around. The brass of the pommel appears to be of fairly flimsy sheet. This spells "late" and possibly decorative or theatrical to me. A blade like the one on that's on there now would likely have had something more substantial. The more I look at the suspension system, the stranger things become. Not only are the soldered/brazed-on bands highly atypical for a saber scabbard, but also I see that the tops of the loops are also attached to the bar itself in a similar fashion. In almost all cases the bar itself is a one-piece construction, either forged and drilled/filed in the case of iron, or cast to shape in the case of non-ferrous alloys.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#18 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Another thing about this set of metal hardware that's a bit funny -- the chape has a chased border with a decorative curlicue at the apex.   The throat and two bands lack any border.  This runs counter to the preference for stylistic consistency when it comes to embellishment of the basic forms.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#19 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Lee, I know that photos can sometimes deceive when it comes to color and tone when camera angle and ambient lighting come into play.   With the piece in your hands, do you notice any difference in the color of the metal between the pommel/ferrule, the guard, and the scabbard fittings?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#20 | 
| 
			
			 EAAF Staff 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Upstate New York, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 970
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It will be a day or two until I can again get the sword in my hands and in good light, but the original set of images was prepared in overcast sunlight.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The scabbard mounts and the guard are in a very similar and quite pale alloy, I presume a brass, though unusually pale. The ferrule of the hilt and the pommel are of a yellower alloy, I believe towards a more 'typical' brass. The scabbard mounts are of adequately thick gauge stock compared to the pommel. My impression was that these mounts did show some age and evidence of honest use, but clearly not so much as the blade, just as you suspect. The lacquer on the scabbard also appeared to have some age.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#21 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Dec 2004 
				Location: California 
				
				
					Posts: 1,036
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks, Lee.  You confirmed my initial suspicion about color difference between the components.  I agree that the scabbard finish and the metal hardware are not new, they have some age though not likely "born together" with the blade.  The wooden parts were fabricated to fit the blade at the time that the metal parts were assembled and installed, whenever that was.  My guess is ca. 1900 or early in the last century.  An altogether interesting and intriguing piece.   
		
		
		
			The red pigment in the fullers is lacquer, it was a form of decoration occasionally done, generally on better blades. Sometimes the fullers were lined in gold. Here is a very fine example, 17th through first half 18th cent., very subdued aesthetic but with channels lined in lacquer and gold, on display at the Museum of the Peoples Liberation Army, Beijing.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#22 | 
| 
			
			 Member 
			
			
			
				
			
			Join Date: Mar 2008 
				Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 64
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hi guys, 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I'm a little late to the party. I see Philip -the O.G. of antique Chinese swords research- pretty much covered it all! Considering his remarks at the tunkou, I agree and when you look at the pattern or pitting on the base of that blade I seem to be making out an outline of the original tunkou which was somewhat longer and of a slightly different profile. The baitong mounted one seems to hark back to Ming dynasty saber designs in a tasteful way. The later suspension bar also reflects this, so whoever made it had some awareness of older pre-Qing stylistic elements. I, too, like the iron-mounted one the most. Some pitting on mounts but considering how rarely good iron-mounted Chinese swords come up these days we should consider ourselves lucky when a complete one turns up at all. Good finds!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |