![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
A KLO may be a perfectly good knife, thai eneps, Viet knives, other recurved knives, kopis, yataghans, etc., it's just not a khukuri. it's Not a disparaging term.
Kothimora scabbards with good functional older design khukuri are cool. The kardas and chakmaks (aux. blades;m karda is a utility knife, chakmak is a hardened very blunt 'steel' for rubbing out dents in the edge.) don't have a cho (and are not khukuris). My Hanshee and my Enep: (and I eventually found a nepali museum with an 18c Khuk with a cho-less ricasso. It does have a proto-cho notch. The swords to the left are Indian sosun-pata KLOs. Last edited by kronckew; 18th June 2022 at 07:40 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 108
|
![]()
Thanks everyone for this information! I was asking more about the traditional Nepalese form, but I like the direction this went with the Kukri Like Objects. Thai enep knives were one of the closest things I have found that resemble a kukri without the cho. Certain examples of Chammoro knives can also resemble a kukri lacking a cho. While I was mulling over this topic I found the Heritage Knives website that features a section dedicated to the history of the military from John Powell, and there is this photo showing multiple kukris. If you look at the one at the very bottom, that example seems to lack the cho entirely, possibly not even having a ricasso. This kukri is the only one that I have seen in the traditional Nepalese form that doesn't even show a trace of the cho.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 207
|
![]()
Here is one of mine without a kaudi.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 536
|
![]()
SidJ
Very interesting. Could you supply close ups of the cho area (most especially), hilt, and blade? Blade and hilt lengths would also be good. Sincerely, RobT Last edited by RobT; 24th June 2022 at 06:59 PM. Reason: additional info requested |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
Hard to tell on that sirupate, sidj.
Some had a closed form like mine: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
More cho/kaudi forms:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Idaho, USA
Posts: 228
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Room 101, Glos. UK
Posts: 4,215
|
![]()
Sidj's khuk appears to have an indistinct black spot that may be a cho of losed/open circular form, or could be a rust/dirt spot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Leiden, NL
Posts: 553
|
![]()
I was fondling my moro keris/kalis tonight - pics attached (sorry about the poor lighting - if anyone is interested I can take a daytime picture) - and I noticed the very cho-like cut-out in the blade. It reminded me of this thread (although I suppose technically it is kind of the anti-thread for it), so I thought I'd ask about it here.
I assume these are related? And if so, is there a connection between the kukri and the kalis? A barong-kukri connection I could see... Both leaf shaped blades and such. But kukri and kalis are quite distinct, and I am not aware of any barong with a cho. It is interesting to see this feature on such different blades. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|