![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 435
|
![]()
The only thing replaced on the rapier is the pommel cap.
One could debate if this is a rapier or a sword, In Italy they used larger blades in they'r rapier guards more often. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,063
|
![]()
In these last photos the rapier looks much much better in any case, as far as the 1 1/2 hander is concerned, it is interesting to know whether the crosses are engraved or debossed/punched.
best, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,036
|
![]()
Yes, I agree that sometimes the distinction between rapier or riding-sword (Reitschwert / spada da cavallo) can get blurry. Riding-swords used the same style hilts (Oakeshott explains this in his European Weapons and Armour...) but their blades were wider to be useful for both cut and thrust. There were many different systems for fighting with rapiers, some did feature more cutting techniques whereas others were more thrust-focused. In fact, in Italian arms terminology there is sometimes used the word striscia for a weapon of rapier configuration but whose very narrow blade was for point work only.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|