![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,365
|
![]()
I could agree with Ariel's assesment of this piece ; possibly not due to the reasons he has given but to this detail which strikes me as fairly lightweight for combat use .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,323
|
![]()
I think that in the Qajar period there were many ceremonial and parade pieces used and certainly made. I would guess that this is one of them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
I am much obliged and fully enlightened with the sum of your three postings.
The blade is also too thin for impact, so i notice ... now. I will file its identity as a parade lance head, late Qajar period ( Nasir ed-din ? ). In this case its haft, if there ever were one, would probably be a short type wood rod, as it should sufise for ceremonial evolutions, probably infantry. Just a pitty i fancy more the collecting of older and efective weapons, although to my eyes i find this still an elegant and meaningfull blade. The socket is fully etched with micro arabesques, probably lettering familiar with the alegories to the Shah on the blade. The brass seaming is perfect and almost invisible. All in all, i like it. Thank you again fernando Last edited by fernando; 8th June 2006 at 07:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|