![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Interesting that the claws section of the winder (cranequin) in the first crossbow are an 'articulated' piece. This is not seen in other crossbows out there.
Also its stock wood looks 'too impecable' ... but i don't know ![]() As for maker, you should have a thorough search everywhere, looking for tiny marks, including on the cranequin; letters, shields, symbols. . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 276
|
![]()
I'm far from an expert on these, but from the ones I've glanced over in auction catalogues and looking at the replica's Todd Cuttler builds... These aren't giving me a warm feeling.
For starters, the craneguin looks fixed to the stock and too small compared to period ones. The proportions of the stock are peculiar and both of them look "unfinished" as opposed to aged. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 74
|
![]()
Another quick test is to undo one of the screws holding the various parts to the stock, a modern machine cut thread is a real giveaway.
Robert |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 34
|
![]()
nk you so much guys! 👍
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
![]()
Guys, don't you find the second one looking more like a genuine piece ?
vantique, could you show us pictures of it in different positions ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 409
|
![]()
It is quite possible they may be remounted or restocked old bows and components. I wouldn't write them off in their entirety.
Regards Richard |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|