![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Quote:
In looking at this again, I see what you mean Will, the hilt does look pretty 'rough'. Good note on the abolished hilt post 1854, these infantry officer M1822 were used until 1890s. Would be nice to see the cartouche. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the wee woods north of Napanee Ontario
Posts: 406
|
The more I look at this sword, the blade appears short for a sword.
I can see there is some loss since the fuller ends near the tip. Could this be a sword bayonet blade? I say this because of the inspection markings which you don't see on infantry sword blades unless a sergeants sword but then only one or two marks. What is the blade length? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Arms Historian
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Route 66
Posts: 10,670
|
Quote:
I think I can add something to support that....I just found my notes on a an Enfield musket converted to Snider with a 'toughra' on the lock, and a LIONS HEAD stamp just ahead of the hammer......the toughra had the date 1874 in the reign of Sher Ali, it is thought there was a shop near Mashin Khana called 'lions head' which used this stamp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
The blade length is approximately 73 CM |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|