![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,855
|
![]()
Very good point not every combatant has lots of money. The example you show is not just a little better it is very nice, the sweep of the quillions balanced superbly by a lovely pommel.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
It is my understanding that lowly peasants 'recuited' into the armies of bygone days were often only armed with agricultural tools. I personally would prefer to use a similar sword featured ...than a poorly made sythe or pitchfork.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: What is still UK
Posts: 5,855
|
![]()
I do not think this goes that far back
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent
Posts: 2,658
|
![]()
Agreed, but the premise is there. Lets face it, weapons were design to kill another human being.
As I mentioned before if this sword evolved over a period of time, no matter how crude the alterations, it still was for its intended use. I think there is some sort of 'honesty' and 'directness' for a weapon that is crude but functional. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|