sword blade, attribution aid

[Dmitry]

Originally Posted by Victrix

Then the inscription must refer to Tsar Peter the Great. That sword must be desirable to Russian collectors. Swedish swords from the Great Nordic War command very high market prices.

I didn't think I had to clarify that it referenced Peter Romanov when I deciphered the inscription, but thank you.
The person who posted the photo says it's in a Belorussian museum. Which one?
He had posted several fake relic swords here previously. Are they also in a Belorussian museum?

[Elmereya]

Dmitriy ,
here is a link to the article from which I posted a photo, it is not translated into English, but I think you can read and explain your sarcasm
https://docviewer.yandex.ru/view/533...89MCJ9&lang=ru

[Dmitry]

Originally Posted by Elmereya

Dmitriy ,
here is a link to the article from which I posted a photo, it is not translated into English, but I think you can read and explain your sarcasm
https://docviewer.yandex.ru/view/533...89MCJ9&lang=ru

There's no sarcasm. You posted 3 or 4 relic swords, which are in my opinion, not from the periods they are supposed to represent. This blade is obviously authentic. In peripheral museums that don't have arms and armor curators there are all kinds of things on display, with all kinds of wild attributions.
The blade you posted is narrow, suited more for an officer's sword than a munitions grade weapon. Any of those brass hilts would work. Good luck!

[Elmereya]

Ok , your opinion is clear, thanks for defining the blade

[Elmereya]

Originally Posted by Dmitry

,, ,, Which one?
He had posted several fake relic swords here previously. Are they also in a Belorussian museum?

This not normal ,
Dmitry, explain your position