|
|
|
23rd March 2021, 07:12 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 70
|
This place
|
|
|
|
23rd March 2021, 07:31 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 252
|
Thank you for your explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
23rd March 2021, 08:03 PM
|
#3 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
What a terrible wound.
|
|
|
|
|
23rd March 2021, 08:46 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 70
|
yes, the wound is serious, and I am glad that I removed the putty, there was a loose substance under it, but in the core it was about 5 mm thick at the site of the cleavage and therefore the sword is strong and still serious
|
|
|
|
|
23rd March 2021, 08:53 PM
|
#5 |
|
(deceased)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 9,694
|
Good thing, Andrey
 .
|
|
|
|
|
23rd March 2021, 09:11 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 70
|
Fernando thank you for your help and support,
the subject is rather difficult to determine, of course, I conducted some research according to the circumstances and place of its discovery, with a high probability, it may have been lost in the winter of 1456 (due to events at the place of its discovery) .. but I wanted to clarify; the blade seems to be a type XIII according to Oakeshott, garda style 5, pommel type VI. (Is Oakeshott possible Italian?) is the subject as a whole likely to be attributed to the late 14th and early 15th centuries? with respect |
|
|
|
|
23rd March 2021, 09:14 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 70
|
Thank you Raf for your question, thanks to him I showed more details,
with respect.. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
