![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
|
![]() Quote:
All that said, while the dagger fits the scabbard perfectly, I have since learned from secure provenance that they are a late marriage, which I don't mind very much, because both are still very nice in their own right. I have also looked through my image collection a bit further to find dated central asian scabbards and have not found very many but at least these three from Hermann Historica. The first is dated 1334 AH - ~1915 and has the maker and owner inscribed 'Amal-e Lotf, Saheb Ali Mohammad ???Qali Adghali???' The second is dated 1329 AH - ~1911 The third is dated quite early, 1126 AH - ~1714, with the maker's name unfortunately not completely depicted Mohammad *unreadable* Zargar (Goldsmith) Buchara (Buchari?) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 153
|
![]()
Thanks for posting these. Interesting pieces. I would read them as you have done and give a reading for one of the names:
1334 AH (1915-16) Work of Lutf (Latif?), owner ‘Ali Muhammad Vali Oghli (Veli Oğlu) 1329 AH (1911-12) 1126 AH - (1714-15) ... (Sayyid?) Muhammad Zargar Bukhari |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 95
|
![]() Quote:
Thank you very much for the correction. I was very unsure about the name because I lack the linguistic background you obviously have. Did you also see the other kard scabbard in the same fashion that I showed a few posts above? It has the same makers' names inscribed as on my example. So seeing how similar in style they all are, I think it would be reasonable to assume that they are all from around the same time and place of origin. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|