Egyptian Curved Sword with scabbord

Andrew · 24th May 2006, 05:10 PM

That is a fine piece! Congratulations.

Mark · 24th May 2006, 06:35 PM

Very nice, indeed. I think someone here knows how to read Burmese, but I can't remember who. The peacock on the grip is that national symbol of Burma, by the way.

The first inscription is up-side-down, though.

I turned it around below.

And just to impress everyone with my idiot-savant abilities (

) ... . I can usually at least sound out the words in Burmese, but this one contains some consonent sounds and diacriticals that I can't figure out. I was hoping for a date (those are easy), but there isn't any. The most I can get from the ferrule inscription is:

__ tu' __ pa'

__ thu' (or maybe thui', in either case with a "high" tone)

sa' ti' nra (and some diacritical I can't figure out)

It is the first letter/cluster in the first and second lines (appears twice in the first line, actually - what looks like a left-facing cresent overlapped by a circle) that I can't find, and the downward swooping line at the end of the second (well, just before the double-dot diacritical) and the third lines. I think the swoop is a diacritical of some sort (additions to consonants that determine vowel sounds, vowel position, and tone).

The engraving on the handle is easier to parse out, but there is again one letter/cluster I can't get:

ba' ma' tui __e'n~ min

In all of these I had to put the accents and tildes after the letter. These are the "classic" pronunciations - modern pronunciation is apparently a little different.

So now anyone who actually reads and speaks Burmese can mock me.

I read somewhere that it takes about 2 years to become proficient in Burmese, so I have a long way to go.

Mark · 24th May 2006, 06:47 PM

About the nail - the blade likely came loose as the wood of the handle aged and shrank, so someone, very likely not someone Burmese or Thai, drilled through the handle and tang and put in the nail. What you found about the tang length is exactly right for a dha. They are very short, and the blade is just held in with a pressure fit, and in most cases an adhesive such as pitch. Taking out the nail and repairing the holes would restore it to the traditional form.

One other thought about the inscription - it might not be Burmese at all, but rather Mon (people in southern Myamar, whom the Burmese call Talaing). I believe the same basic alphabet is used by both, but there are differences in how they are written because they are very different languages. That might explain the odd letters/diacriticals.

kronckew · 24th May 2006, 10:18 PM

thanks for all that work mark, i'm glad you were able to make some sense
of it, i like knowing all i can find out about my collection items. i was hoping
there was a date on it in the inscriptions so i'd have an idea of how old it
is.

i'll be leaving the nail in for now, may replace it with a silver pin later. the
tang on the new one is about an inch or so longer than the one on my
other burmese dha, the tang on this one extends about 3.5" into the grip:

shown with a 21" kukhri. the dha was brought back from burma by a chindit
who took it off a japanese who no longer needed it. i gather the japanese
had taken it off a burmese who no longer needed it. the chindit of course
used his kukhri to convince the japanese of the need to visit his ancestors.

silver niello work on the blade sides and spine. the bit on the spine has a
gold border.

my naga dha just to complete the set.

i had a parang (~12" blade) last weekend that looked like the previous owner
had secured the tang to the grip with some crumbling powdery substance, it
came loose with a slight pull to reveal a 2" tang tapering from about 1/2" wide
down to 1/4", i reset it in the wood handle with some resin & tested it out on
a 2 inch thick branch in my garden that needed removal. branch did not survive,
parang did & handle is not going anywhere. they made them like that thru many
centuries and i'm sure if they were not strong enough, they'd not be made that way.

Aqtai · 26th May 2006, 10:34 PM

Definitely NOT Egyptian, as you probably know very well already that is a dha.

Why the seller thought it was Egyptian is absolutely beyond me. Any "Egyptian swords" would probably look like Turkish Kilijs, because Egypt was after all part of the Ottoman Empire from 1517 AD up until 1882 when it was invaded by the British, even then it remained officially part of the Ottoman Empire until 1914.

Congratulations on getting a very nice dha.

kronckew · 27th May 2006, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aqtai

Definitely NOT Egyptian, as you probably know very well already that is a dha.

Why the seller thought it was Egyptian is absolutely beyond me. Any "Egyptian swords" would probably look like Turkish Kilijs, because Egypt was after all part of the Ottoman Empire from 1517 AD up until 1882 when it was invaded by the British, even then it remained officially part of the Ottoman Empire until 1914.

Congratulations on getting a very nice dha.

yes, to us it was a bit obvious what it really was

, to the vendor, who was a woman, she had no idea. after i won it, i messaged her to let her know what it really was, she replied that she'd asked someone what it was and i quote "...the silly arse..." told her he thought it was egyptian. i assume it was her husband from that remark

.

one of these days i'll snag a nice turkish kilij - which no doubt will be listed as an 'indian tulwar'

i keep my eyes open for listing anomalies on ebay as it can lead to good deals sometimes.

kronckew · 22nd February 2015, 12:02 AM

found this old thread while researching for another thread. as the original pics of my 'egyptian sword' no longer exist, i'll add some back as attachments.

(one of my favourite swords and a very fine burmese dha)

24th May 2006, 06:35 PM	#2
Mark Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 987	Very nice, indeed. I think someone here knows how to read Burmese, but I can't remember who. The peacock on the grip is that national symbol of Burma, by the way. The first inscription is up-side-down, though. I turned it around below. And just to impress everyone with my idiot-savant abilities ( ) ... . I can usually at least sound out the words in Burmese, but this one contains some consonent sounds and diacriticals that I can't figure out. I was hoping for a date (those are easy), but there isn't any. The most I can get from the ferrule inscription is: __ tu' __ pa' __ thu' (or maybe thui', in either case with a "high" tone) sa' ti' nra (and some diacritical I can't figure out) It is the first letter/cluster in the first and second lines (appears twice in the first line, actually - what looks like a left-facing cresent overlapped by a circle) that I can't find, and the downward swooping line at the end of the second (well, just before the double-dot diacritical) and the third lines. I think the swoop is a diacritical of some sort (additions to consonants that determine vowel sounds, vowel position, and tone). The engraving on the handle is easier to parse out, but there is again one letter/cluster I can't get: ba' ma' tui __e'n~ min In all of these I had to put the accents and tildes after the letter. These are the "classic" pronunciations - modern pronunciation is apparently a little different. So now anyone who actually reads and speaks Burmese can mock me. I read somewhere that it takes about 2 years to become proficient in Burmese, so I have a long way to go. Attached Images

24th May 2006, 06:47 PM	#3
Mark Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 987	One more thing ... About the nail - the blade likely came loose as the wood of the handle aged and shrank, so someone, very likely not someone Burmese or Thai, drilled through the handle and tang and put in the nail. What you found about the tang length is exactly right for a dha. They are very short, and the blade is just held in with a pressure fit, and in most cases an adhesive such as pitch. Taking out the nail and repairing the holes would restore it to the traditional form. One other thought about the inscription - it might not be Burmese at all, but rather Mon (people in southern Myamar, whom the Burmese call Talaing). I believe the same basic alphabet is used by both, but there are differences in how they are written because they are very different languages. That might explain the odd letters/diacriticals. Last edited by Mark Bowditch; 24th May 2006 at 07:19 PM.

24th May 2006, 10:18 PM	#4
kronckew Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Room 101, Glos. UK Posts: 4,216	thanks for all that work mark, i'm glad you were able to make some sense of it, i like knowing all i can find out about my collection items. i was hoping there was a date on it in the inscriptions so i'd have an idea of how old it is. i'll be leaving the nail in for now, may replace it with a silver pin later. the tang on the new one is about an inch or so longer than the one on my other burmese dha, the tang on this one extends about 3.5" into the grip: shown with a 21" kukhri. the dha was brought back from burma by a chindit who took it off a japanese who no longer needed it. i gather the japanese had taken it off a burmese who no longer needed it. the chindit of course used his kukhri to convince the japanese of the need to visit his ancestors. silver niello work on the blade sides and spine. the bit on the spine has a gold border. my naga dha just to complete the set. i had a parang (~12" blade) last weekend that looked like the previous owner had secured the tang to the grip with some crumbling powdery substance, it came loose with a slight pull to reveal a 2" tang tapering from about 1/2" wide down to 1/4", i reset it in the wood handle with some resin & tested it out on a 2 inch thick branch in my garden that needed removal. branch did not survive, parang did & handle is not going anywhere. they made them like that thru many centuries and i'm sure if they were not strong enough, they'd not be made that way. Last edited by kronckew; 25th May 2006 at 07:40 AM.

22nd February 2015, 12:02 AM	#7
kronckew Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Room 101, Glos. UK Posts: 4,216	found this old thread while researching for another thread. as the original pics of my 'egyptian sword' no longer exist, i'll add some back as attachments. (one of my favourite swords and a very fine burmese dha) Attached Images

24th May 2006, 05:10 PM	#1
Andrew Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: USA Posts: 1,725	That is a fine piece! Congratulations.

26th May 2006, 10:34 PM	#5
Aqtai Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Merseyside, UK Posts: 222	Definitely NOT Egyptian, as you probably know very well already that is a dha. Why the seller thought it was Egyptian is absolutely beyond me. Any "Egyptian swords" would probably look like Turkish Kilijs, because Egypt was after all part of the Ottoman Empire from 1517 AD up until 1882 when it was invaded by the British, even then it remained officially part of the Ottoman Empire until 1914. Congratulations on getting a very nice dha.