![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 259
|
![]()
Could the blade also be locally forged in the Maghreb/ morocco, or an imported blade?
the fullers look wonky... and the quillon is definitely the most primitive ive seen on a nimcha, gots a cool look though. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 259
|
![]()
has anyone ever seen one of the nimchas made en mass for the siege of Malta?
this sword seems made more for function than for show like some fancy adorned nimchas. i also get the interpretation the symbols on this blade , were put there to imbue it with functional properties, not as a stasus symbol or decoration. i figure this squiggly line is for cutting, the other symbol on opposite side of blade for puncturing /thrusting, and the scabbard symbol for protection. how does one date this sword? forgive me i am typing this response and didn't take note of who, but someone said 19C . sounds fair enough but how was this determined I am curious? Thanks for any input |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]() Quote:
When it comes to dating swords, in the absence of a strong provenance or a date on the blade or the fittings, the only option is to do it by comparing the features of the sword to other examples. This is where the forum search function can be extremely helpful. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,145
|
![]()
I agree 100% with the above
And I will add that no elements on your sword can support an early date, 18th or 17th c. So your sword must be late 19th c or even early 20th c. Your quillons are a bit flat and crude, not the typical water drops from the 19thc. So either your sword is Berber tribal 19th c. or it's a basic nimcha from the early 20th c. I vote for the tribal nimcha with local engravings on the blade. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 259
|
![]()
thanks TVV & Kubur , I did see many Nimchas on this forum, even the thread with the many Nimchas in the museum. there was a flyssa sold recently by the same person i acquired my Nimcha from, and the flyssa had the same red number markings, so they must have some connection, and I am quite certain my sword is Berber also.
I am just trying to to learn how the age of a nimcha is estimated. i am still unaware of the specific attributes the older vesions would have, besides the rhino horn and being less primitive in look. but because my nimcha looked primitive i thought it could be older,. I will try to take a look at those nimchas you suggested with the provenance. I read about the seige of Malta somewhere while researching Nimchas and I though , I would like to see what one that old looks like... so ya thanks TVV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,664
|
![]()
The materials used are not necessarily a good indicator of age. There are some great rhino hilt examples from the 19th century. The shape of the grip and the guard are more important. Yours are both typical of Moroccan swords from the 19th century. Fortunately, there are a lot of pictures from the 19th centuries of this type of hilt, as well as examples captured by the French and the Spanish in their colonial military conflicts in the area following the Berlin Congress. I am attaching some Spanish trophies. If those were from the Rif War, it would date them to the 1920s.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 259
|
![]()
thanks for more input, Those are very nice swords, TVV, with what looks like Rhino , prestige prizes i would think, while my sword appears less fancy to put it nicely, which makes me think maybe the user was more likely to be carrying an older sword.
i did see many with similar bone handles as mine and i could attach a photo, again a much nicer sword. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|