|  | 
|  | 
|  29th January 2021, 12:42 AM | #1 | |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2017 
					Posts: 445
				 |   Quote: 
 | |
|   |   | 
|  30th January 2021, 02:26 PM | #2 | |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany, Dortmund 
					Posts: 9,409
				 |   Quote: 
 I don't know who Shawn is!  I see on your pictures directly under the plant fiber a binding most possible from irion, test it by magnet, I bet that I am correct. Down from the handle I see renants from a former longer copper binding. The plant fiber binding isn't rattan IMVHO. Regards, Detlef | |
|   |   | 
|  3rd February 2021, 05:39 PM | #3 | |
| Member Join Date: May 2020 Location: Florence, Italy 
					Posts: 64
				 |   Quote: 
 Am I wrong? On the other hand, I believe that it can be said with certainty that it is not an agricultural tool, in consideration of the vegetable intertwining, which certainly has no functional purposes, but only aesthetic purposes, and which is in a position such as to be easily destroyed during the work. I think it is more likely a ritual object, in fact the use of scythes is very frequent and documented, in the course of dances and rituals connected to the harvest, and consequently to fertility. Saluti. Duccio | |
|   |   | 
|  3rd February 2021, 06:00 PM | #4 | |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Germany, Dortmund 
					Posts: 9,409
				 |   Quote: 
 So far I know is the real rattan from South-East-Asia and coming from a palm, Calamus Rotang, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calamus_rotang Best regards, Detlef | |
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |