![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
Taming Sari did belonged to Hang Tuah, Admiral of the Malaccan Sultanate. The keris still exists today and is part of the regalia of Sultan Azlan Shah, the Sultan of Perak, Malaysia. http://www.perak.gov.my/sultan/english/keris_taming.htm What do you think? ![]() Btw, the question is about Kraton keris (Javanese), not about Malay Sultanate keris. Let's go back to the main question, "What Constitute a Kraton Keris?" shall we? ![]() Last edited by Alam Shah; 22nd May 2006 at 03:15 AM. Reason: added link... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
|
![]() Quote:
Do you mean Javanese palaces in general, or just the palaces of Yogya and Solo?( BTW, Yogya and Solo are both Sultanates too). I am aware of differences in keris protocols among palaces (even between Yogya and Solo), although I am unaware of any standard for their classification. Someone will no doubt enlighten me/us. BTW,WRT Tameng Sari... The version of the legend I know: Tameng Sari was the name of the owner of the keris, whom Hang Tuah defeated while on a visit to Java. The keris was subsequently presented to him by the king of Majapait. Regards |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,248
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,180
|
![]()
The book that I've read is simply entitled "Keraton Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat", or something like that. I don't have the book with me now. It was published in Indonesia, in English. Those of you staying in or near Singapore can head to the National Library near Bugis Street, S.E.A. studies reference section. Sorry, you can't borrow it, so you'll have to read it there.
![]() I think everyone has brought up valid points for consideration. We don't have to agree with each other, but we should recognize the differences in interpretation of what a "kraton keris" could mean. So what this could mean to us collectors is that when we purchase a keris described as such, dig further and find out what the seller meant, and make a judgement for yourself whether it is believable or not. At any rate, like I (and some other collectors) always say - buy the keris, not the story, and no matter if it's a new keris or old keris, always buy quality kerises. And please don't stop discussing here! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Vikingsword Staff
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,336
|
![]()
" Buy the keris, not the story, and no matter if it's a new keris or old keris, always buy quality kerises. "
Well said ! Better one quality keris than a dozen inferior pieces . Quality over quantity every time . |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|