![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 90
|
![]()
"Kusia" is a term I've not encountered before.
I have, however, seen photos of hilts described as "kocetan"; most have "horse heads", but a very few have "insect-like" heads. And I've read that kocetan hilts were (in pre-puputan times, if not nowadays) supposed to be owned by Brahmins more-or-less exclusively. This may or may not be true, precise, or accurate. I myself am very ignorant about religion and keris culture on Bali. They are very striking hilts, however, and not unattractive. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
Thanks for the input here gentlemen. I look forward to making the correction.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
|
![]()
Way it worked is this Mickey:-
the jamprahan sarung was for religious people (agamawan) the jamprahan was paired with the gagang kusia the Brahmin caste is the caste that is concerned with religion if we are looking for God-botherers we look amongst the Brahmins, because this is where we will find the agamawan. The "insect with tusks" is Neka's description, not mine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]()
Jasper J.E., who started to gather his information at the very beginning of 1900'ties and published his book with Mas Pirngadie in 1930, states, that Kocet-Kocetan hilt was called Kusia in Klungkung.
He writes also, this hilt from could be made from black wood with golden ornaments or entirely in gold, made with the same process like Togog hilts. Interestingly, the drawing of Nieuwenkamp from 1907 shows both forms, which are different indeed. In an older thread Fearn identified these forms as the pupa and adult beetle, two different stages of the same insect. Accuracy of a drawing and of information generally can be always questioned. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
|
![]() Quote:
What interests me is Bali before 1908. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 470
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
|
![]()
Hello Gustav,
Quote:
Both hilts in the figure clearly represent the pupa stage (and metamorphosis/transition seems to be the main religious message associated with this style of hilt): Only in the pupa stage does the wing stick out between the second and third pair of legs (i.e. partly covering the latter) and this is a consistent feature of every hilt of decent craftsmanship that I've come across. The antennae (the long "horns" of the beetle) of a cerambicyd pupa can be more or less curled (their relative length also depends on the species) and their head is very similar to the adult. [Just search for Cerambycidae AND pupa for some pics!] Moreover, adult beetles spread their antennae to the side or in front - not backwards (the drawing was probably taken from an entomological museum specimen with folded back antennae for handling/security/space reasons). Thus, I assume that differences in style of these hilts is not based on any biological difference but rather cultural developments and possibly loss of knowledge with later examples. There certainly seems to be a tendency with heads kinda resembling horses(?) more and more (including added non-insect ears and facial features). Or is this another symbolism seeping in? Regards, Kai |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|