Ethnographic Arms & Armour
 

Go Back   Ethnographic Arms & Armour > Discussion Forums > Keris Warung Kopi
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22nd September 2020, 11:31 AM   #1
Mickey the Finn
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 90
Default About that face...

"Kusia" is a term I've not encountered before.
I have, however, seen photos of hilts described as "kocetan"; most have "horse heads", but a very few have "insect-like" heads. And I've read that kocetan hilts were (in pre-puputan times, if not nowadays) supposed to be owned by Brahmins more-or-less exclusively. This may or may not be true, precise, or accurate. I myself am very ignorant about religion and keris culture on Bali.
They are very striking hilts, however, and not unattractive.
Mickey the Finn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2020, 12:03 PM   #2
CharlesS
Member
 
CharlesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 1,854
Default

Thanks for the input here gentlemen. I look forward to making the correction.
CharlesS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2020, 12:25 PM   #3
A. G. Maisey
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,015
Default

Way it worked is this Mickey:-

the jamprahan sarung was for religious people (agamawan)

the jamprahan was paired with the gagang kusia

the Brahmin caste is the caste that is concerned with religion

if we are looking for God-botherers we look amongst the Brahmins, because this is where we will find the agamawan.

The "insect with tusks" is Neka's description, not mine.
A. G. Maisey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2020, 01:00 PM   #4
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
Default

Jasper J.E., who started to gather his information at the very beginning of 1900'ties and published his book with Mas Pirngadie in 1930, states, that Kocet-Kocetan hilt was called Kusia in Klungkung.

He writes also, this hilt from could be made from black wood with golden ornaments or entirely in gold, made with the same process like Togog hilts.

Interestingly, the drawing of Nieuwenkamp from 1907 shows both forms, which are different indeed. In an older thread Fearn identified these forms as the pupa and adult beetle, two different stages of the same insect.

Accuracy of a drawing and of information generally can be always questioned.
Attached Images
 
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2020, 01:50 PM   #5
Jean
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
Interestingly, the drawing of Nieuwenkamp from 1907 shows both forms, which are different indeed. In an older thread Fearn identified these forms as the pupa and adult beetle, two different stages of the same insect.
Pics of 2 different forms of hilt kocet-kocetan, and there are even more....
Attached Images
  
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2020, 02:04 PM   #6
Gustav
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean
Pics of 2 different forms of hilt kocet-kocetan, and there are even more....
Now - of course, there are a plenty of them.

What interests me is Bali before 1908.
Gustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2020, 04:33 PM   #7
Anthony G.
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustav
Now - of course, there are a plenty of them.

What interests me is Bali before 1908.
Hi, why so before 1908?
Anthony G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2020, 06:13 PM   #8
kai
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,255
Wink

Hello Gustav,

Quote:
Interestingly, the drawing of Nieuwenkamp from 1907 shows both forms, which are different indeed. In an older thread Fearn identified these forms as the pupa and adult beetle, two different stages of the same insect.
These are longicorn beetles (family Cerambycidae). I believe Nieuwenkamp just shows the pupa and the imago (adult) for illustrative purposes since the adult beetles are/were fairly well known to the general audience in Europe while coming across a pupa is certainly much rarer.

Both hilts in the figure clearly represent the pupa stage (and metamorphosis/transition seems to be the main religious message associated with this style of hilt): Only in the pupa stage does the wing stick out between the second and third pair of legs (i.e. partly covering the latter) and this is a consistent feature of every hilt of decent craftsmanship that I've come across. The antennae (the long "horns" of the beetle) of a cerambicyd pupa can be more or less curled (their relative length also depends on the species) and their head is very similar to the adult. [Just search for Cerambycidae AND pupa for some pics!]

Moreover, adult beetles spread their antennae to the side or in front - not backwards (the drawing was probably taken from an entomological museum specimen with folded back antennae for handling/security/space reasons).

Thus, I assume that differences in style of these hilts is not based on any biological difference but rather cultural developments and possibly loss of knowledge with later examples. There certainly seems to be a tendency with heads kinda resembling horses(?) more and more (including added non-insect ears and facial features).

Or is this another symbolism seeping in?

Regards,
Kai
kai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Posts are regarded as being copyrighted by their authors and the act of posting material is deemed to be a granting of an irrevocable nonexclusive license for display here.