![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 91
|
![]()
Shrug
![]() ![]() Welp, can't do anything now, I just paid it off. Honestly, what ever the finding is, I like it, it is a solid fighting kris with no separate gangya which susceptible to cracks. My thoughts, it's a no tourist piece even the luks. As soon as I get it, I will post close up photos. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
EAAF Staff
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,272
|
![]() Quote:
One other possiblity that I wonder about (not mentioned in Cato) is that it and others could have been true battle pieces that were later engraved either for talismanic or sales purposes. Although this hypothesis would place such a piece in the market place, it would not catagorize these as pieces made for the tourist market (only adapted for it). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 91
|
![]() Quote:
I hear you, boss ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|